雅思写作task2高分范文：关于学生学科优劣范文及解题思路

雅思写作 题目 涉及 范围很广但是又很贴近生活。今天小编为大家整理了雅思写作task2关于学生学科优劣的高分范文，来看看吧。

写作题目： For older school children, some people think that these children should study a large number of subjects, but others believe that children should study less subjects but in details. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

写作题目讲解 ：

第一，考生可以说接触到更广泛的知识，拓宽视野，启发好奇心。

第二，学科之间的内在联系让学生可以更深刻地理解世界和社会，学习多角度理解事物但是：人的发展是不均衡的，不得不学习自己不擅长的科目可能会令学生产生厌学情绪。

第三，专攻的效率和成绩及其可以选择自己喜欢的科目。

写作范文：

There has been a debate about the range of subjects students are encouraged to learn. While some people advocate a curriculum covering a wide variety of subjects, others propose a more concentrating way of study.

关于鼓励学生学习科目的问题一直争论不休。虽然有些人提倡一门涵盖多种科目的课程，但另一些人则提出一种更加集中的学习方式。

Some people argue that students should be engaged into a broad range of curriculum and their most convincing reason is the possible scope of knowledge and horizon that students can expand during their learning process. It is true that such students would be exposed to various disciplines which allow them to understand the world and society from a variety of perspectives. What’s more, these diverse areas of knowledge are connected with each other directly or indirectly,facilitating students to better and more deeply understand each subject and inspiring their curiosity to their world. However, not everyone gets developed in balance. While some students are excellent at language and weak at mathematics, some are talented in science and challenged by history. In these cases, coercing school children to study the subjects that they find difficult is very likely to end up with students getting tired of study altogether which is certainly the last thing that educators and parents would want to see.

一些人认为学生应该参与广泛的课程，他们最令人信服的原因是学生在学习过程中可能扩大的知识范围和视野。的确，这些学生将接触到各种学科，这些学科使他们能够从多种角度了解世界和社会。更重要的是，这些不同的知识领域直接或间接地联系在一起，促进学生更好、更深刻地理解每门学科，激发他们对世界的好奇心。然而，并不是每个人都得到平衡发展。有些学生语言好，数学差，有些学生在科学方面有天赋，受到历史的挑战。在这些情况下，强迫学童学习他们觉得困难的科目很可能会导致学生对学习感到厌倦，这肯定是教育工作者和家长最不想看到的。

The other side of the argument is also reasonable. Teenagers focusing on a few subjects tend to be able to perform well because they concentrate their limited time and energy on a narrow range of school work. The increased efficiency and academic results in turn enhance their confidence in their academic ability and sense of achievement. Allowing students to select a *all number of subjects also gives them the opportunity to be only immersed in their favorites classes or what they are good at instead of those (that)they have no clue about at all. This is crucial for individuals and society as well because it means that everyone can be an able and useful person as everyone has his/her strength.

争论的另一面也是合理的。关注少数科目的青少年往往能够表现良好，因为他们把有限的时间和精力集中在狭窄范围的学校工作上。效率的提高和学业成绩的提高反过来又增强了他们对学术能力和成就感的信心。允许学生选择少数科目也给他们机会只沉浸在他们最喜欢的课程或者他们擅长的课程中，而不是那些他们根本不知道的课程。这对个人和社会也是至关重要的，因为这意味着每个人都可以成为一个有能力和有用的人，因为每个人都有他/她的力量。

My personal view about this controversy is that both sides are based on good sense, and they can be reconciled with each other. In the primary stage of education, children should be encouraged to get involved in as many areas of knowledge as possible so as to have more chances to experience the world. As for the secondary school, adolescents basically have identified their tendency in academic and career terms, so they should be allowed to narrow down their study to a particular domain related to their future career.

我个人对这场争论的看法是，双方都是建立在良好的基础上的，他们可以相互和解。在教育的初级阶段，应该鼓励孩子参与到尽可能多的知识领域，以便有更多的机会去体验世界。至于中学，青少年在学术和职业方面基本上已经确定了他们的倾向，因此应该允许他们把学习范围缩小到与未来职业相关的特定领域。