雅思写作高分大作文范文：教育能更好解决犯罪的问题?

题目讲解：

这是一道【A/D】比较型考试类型，题目中就解决犯罪问题方面，是否“教育”比“关监狱”更有效果进行提问

解题要点词：

1. useless：不同意，关监狱对于解决犯罪还是起着一定的威慑作用

2. better：可以同意，可以从长远角度考虑，“预防与未然。

所以建议观点可以侧一边倒或采用让步论证法

雅思写作范文：

First thing first, accept that sending criminals to prison is an effective, if not the only way, to protect society. Stop thinking in terms of education as "punishment" for a moment and instead think about safeguarding innocent people from incorrigible violent sex offenders, trigger-happy drug dealers, and cold-blooded murderers. Education does reduce crimes to some extent; however, it is doubtful if most of them would choose to live a life that is crime-free.

首先，接受将罪犯送进监狱是一种有效的保护社会的方法，如果不是唯一的方法的话。不要再把教育当作一种“惩罚”了，取而代之的是把无辜的人从不可救药的性犯罪者、好战的毒品贩子和冷血的凶手手中拯救出来。教育确实在一定程度上减少了犯罪;然而，他们中的大多数人是否会选择过一个没有犯罪的生活是值得怀疑的。

Since most inmates eventually return to the community, it seems not a bad idea to help them learn a trade and gain skills to make a decent living. And that is why training programs are often believed to be positive in changing criminal behavior. Nevertheless, most statistics tend to tell a different story. As it is, rather than becoming productive members of society, they turn themselves into more skilled criminals. So it is one thing that rehabilitation offers opportunities; it is quite another whether career criminals make good use of their prison time. In most cases, after serving their terms they continue commiting offences of a more sophisticated kind.

由于大多数犯人最终会回到社区，帮助他们学习一门手艺并获得技能以过上体面的生活，这似乎不是一个坏主意。这就是为什么培训项目通常被认为是积极改变犯罪行为的原因。尽管如此，大多数统计数据都倾向于讲述一个不同的故事。事实上，他们非但没有成为社会的有生产力的成员，反而把自己变成了更有技能的罪犯。因此，康复是一件事，它提供了机会;职业罪犯是否能充分利用他们的服刑时间，这是另一回事。在大多数情况下，在服完他们的条款后，他们会继续犯下更复杂的罪行。

Education is more a romantic option than an effective solution for crime problems. At this point, it must be made clear that the argument is not against education in correctional facilities, considering that most inmates are under-educated. Rather, the case is concerned about a control policy to strictly supervise specific released prisoners for at least two years to observe what might happen to society. Here, skeptics claim that, in many cases, prison education produces nothing more than "better-educated criminals", only more dangerous. That the violent crime wave is raging while most prisons are over-crowded certainly does not reflect a significant decrease in recidivi*. It merely shows the fear and impotence of innocent people in the community.

教育与其说是解决犯罪问题的有效方法，不如说是一种浪漫的选择。在这一点上，必须明确的是，考虑到大多数囚犯受教育程度较低，这一论点并不反对在惩教设施中的教育。更确切地说，该案件关注的是一项控制政策，严格监督特定释放囚犯至少两年，以观察社会可能发生的情况。在这里，怀疑论者声称，在许多情况下，监狱教育只会产生“受过良好教育的罪犯”，只不过更危险而已。暴力犯罪浪潮汹涌而来，而大多数监狱人满为患，这并不能反映出重犯率的显著下降。它仅仅显示了社区中无辜的人的恐惧和无能。

The point is that sending criminals to prison is effective, if only by moving them away from the community. On the other hand, to regard prison education as an effective "punishment" is simply wishful-thinking, in view of relevant evidence that underlies recidivi*. In all events, education provides opportunities, however limited, but it depends on the way those repeat offenders see these opportunities, the rest being pure guessing.

关键在于，如果把罪犯送进监狱是有效的，只要把他们从社区中移走就行了。另一方面，把监狱教育作为一种有效的“惩罚”，只是简单的想法，因为有相关的证据表明再犯的存在。在所有的事件中，教育都提供了机会，无论多么有限，但这取决于那些惯犯们看到这些机会的方式，其余的都是纯粹的猜测。

最新热文推荐：