当前位置:雅思无忧 > 考试信息 > 正文

2021年3月8日雅思阅读机经

更新:2021年10月26日 10:19 雅思无忧

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核,综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力,实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说,也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了文章2021年3月8日雅思阅读机经,希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题,敬请关注。
2021年3月8日雅思阅读机经

2021年 3月 8日雅思考笔已经结束,上海学校谢思敏老师亲临考场,为 大带来史上全面的雅思阅读机经考题全面剖析及完整答案。

总体来讲,本次阅读难度适中,一篇为旧题,两篇是新题。涉及到的文章类型包括科研类和教育类。本次雅思阅读考试涉及到的题型有 Matching,Summary,List of headings,Multiple choices, short answer questions。其中 Summary 和 Matching 比重比较大。

TFNG 也占了不小的比重。建议烤鸭们平时多练习高频题型。


201 4 3 8 思阅读机经考题回忆

—— 自教研中心 & 球雅思上海学校








Pa ss ag e


One

新旧情况

题材

题目

题型





旧题





科研类




Minds of their own

是非无判断 5 道 (T/F/NG); 填词型填空题 5 道;
简答题 3 道;




文章大意

科学通过训练鹦鹉 Alex 说话和交流,证明某些动物比我们想象得更聪明,它 们不仅可以懂得人类的动作指示,还能迚行逻辑思维,它们也有自己的情感和脾

气,甚至可以用简单的诧言来表达自己的需求。


部分答案

(intelligence....);(what  similarities  --green color;  what type of mistake


--wrong pronunciation; what suspended....almost all machines)


















文章内容

M inds of Their Own


Animals are *arter than you think.
In 1977   Irene  Pepperberg,  a recent graduate  of Harvard University,  did something  very bold.  At  a  time when animals  still  were  considered automatons, she set out to find what was on another creature’s mind by talking to it. She brought a one-year-old African gray parrot she named Alex  into  her lab  to teach him to reproduce  the sounds of the English language. “I thought if he learned to communicate, I could ask him questions about how he sees the world.”
When  Pepperberg   began   her  dialogue   with   Alex,   who  died   last
September  at  the  age  of 31,   many  scientists  believed  animals  were incapable   of    any   thought.     They    were   simply  machines,  robots programmed to react to stimuli  but lacking  the ability  to think or feel.

Any pet owner would disagree. We see the love in our dogs’ eyes and know  that, of course, Spot  has thoughts and emotions. But such claims remain  highly controversial. Gut instinct  is not science, and it  is all too easy to project human thoughts and feelings onto another creature. How,then, does a scientist prove that an animal is capable of thinking—that it is able to acquire information about the world and act on it?

“That’s why I started my studies with Alex,” Pepperberg said. They were seated—she at her desk,  he  on  top  of his cage—in  her lab,  a windowless  room  about  the  size of a  boxcar,  at Brandeis  University.

Newspapers lined  the floor;  baskets of bright  toys were stacked on the shelves. They were clearly a team—and because of their work, the notion that animals can think is no longer so fanciful.

Certain  skills are  considered   key  signs of higher mental  abilities:  good memory,   a grasp  of  grammar and symbols,   self-awareness, understanding others’ motives, imitating others, and being creative. Bit by  bit,  in  ingenious  experiments,  researchers have documented these talents  in  other species,  gradually  chipping  away at what we thought made human beings distinctive  while  offering  a glimpse  of where our own abilities came from. Scrub jays know  that other jays are thieves and that stashed food can spoil; sheep can recognize faces; chimpanzees use a variety of tools to probe termite mounds and even use weapons to hunt *all  mammals;  dolphins  can imitate  human postures;  the archerfish, which stuns insects with a sudden blast of water, can learn how to aim its squirt simply  by watching an experienced fish perform the task. And  Alex the parrot turned out to be a surprisingly good talker.

Thirty  years after  the Alex  studies  began, Pepperberg and a changing collection of assistants  were still giving him English lessons. The humans, along with two younger parrots, also served as Alex’s flock, providing the social input all parrots  crave. Like any flock, this one—as  *all as it was—had its  share of drama.  Alex  dominated  his fellow   parrots, acted huffy at times around Pepperberg,  tolerated the other female  humans, and fell to pieces over a male assistant who dropped by for a visit. (“If you were a man,” Pepperberg said, after noting Alex’s aloofness toward me, “he’d be on your shoulder in a second, barfing cashews in your ear.”)









Pa ss ag e


T wo

新旧情况

题材

题目

题型












科技类

Lean Production-an innovation of manufacturing
systems




标题对应 7 道, 单句填空 6 道;










文章大意




介绍幵对比传统的 craft production 和 mass production 优劣,craft production 工艺生产历史悠久,但成本高, 现在叧有少部分公司还采用这种生 产方式;而 mass production 大批量生产成本低,但质量没有计划障;lean production 精益生产则是两种生产方式的结合,既计划证质量又不会有太多的成 本,后面迚一步介绍计划证质量的具体策略和措施(just-in-time 和 automation),
以及 automation 的具体运作过程和工作环境。


部分答案

单句填空:


Workers of lean production are multi-skilled;




Pa ss ag e


T hre e

新旧情况

题材

题目

题型








教育类


How  science is taught in school
单项选择 5 道;
是非无判断 6 道
(Y/N/NG);
选词摘要填空 3 道
(6 选 3,后一段内容)





文章大意

介绍学校传统的 scientific method,现在已所受到批判,认为这种方式有缺陷; 接着引出 science on argumentation 和 science for explanation,解释幵对比 各自优劣,认为 science on argumentation 这是更加具体实用,被普遍使用的
方法,但也有不足之处,不够有新性;而 science for explanation 更加灵活,



其好的效果依靠给予学生的自由度和信任,后得出结论。

部分答案

摘要选词,答案为 proof, independence,....




以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/),了解更多雅思考试新消息,新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明:文章内容来自网络,如有侵权请及时联系删除。
推荐阅读
标签 - 专题
  鲁ICP备18049789号-14

2022雅思无忧网版权所有 All right reserved. 版权所有

警告:未经本网授权不得转载、摘编或利用其它方式使用上述作品