2021-05-12: Task 2 (Indonesia)
About the huge amount time and money for protecting the wild animals should be for human population. To what extends do you agree or disagree.

范文1：

Preserving wildlife and tackling a variety of problems in our society such as education or healthcare are among one of the most fiercely debated issues. While I agree that state budget should be used to protect wild animals, I would like to argue that the government should also spend funds solving other issues in our everyday life.

On the one hand, it is believed that the central authorities should allocate national fund for wildlife preservation. Firstly, there is an array of endangered animals which are on the verge of extinction. Without money funded for protection, those animals will die out, which has a negative impact on our ecological balance. For instance, the disappearance of one species will result in the collapse of the others, including human whose living depends on it. Additionally, some people regard conserving wild animals is one kind of preserving the beauty and diversity of our earth. It is the variety of fauna that contributes vastly to scientific research. In short, protecting wildlife is also protecting people’s life.

On the other hand, I agree that state fund should be used for tackling problems in our society because it is education, healthcare and the like that affects directly our life. Without knowledge and a healthy body, mankind could not develop. For instance, in Africa, it is illiteracy and epidemics that prevents the development of the countries, in contrast to the USA, a mighty nation with standard services. That is the reason why better education and heath care quality mean higher standard of living.Additionally, money should be spent on such problems as environmental pollution. Nowadays, contamination is among the most pressing problems as it has damaged our surroundings and caused perilous diseases for people.

In conclusion, the government should take wildlife and other problems in the society into consideration as these factors all have a great impact on our life.
In conclusion, the government should take wildlife and other problems in the society into consideration as these factors all have a great impact on our life.

范文2：

There are many arguments around the question whether people should spend a huge amount of money on protecting wild animals or use expenditure on the survival of humankind. In my perspective, people should keep balance the resources allocated for human and other species.

On the one hand, money and effort should be spent on welfare of human. Firstly, there are still various problems which need to be solve in this society. Many undeveloped countries possess high-rate of homelessness and poverty. Many lives are facing death because of starvation. As a results, the government should focus on raising funds to help poor people to overcome the situation rather than pay attention on wild animals. Secondly, animals living in wild are one of the culprits of food loss in farms. They eat crops, destroy many farms, which reduce the quality and quantity of agricultural products. Therefore, spending money to protect wild species is sometime unnecessary.

On the other hand, people also need to make bug effort to protect wild life. One of the reason is that protecting other animals will help humankind preserve rare gene resources, which benefit people in many aspects. By researching and experiments, scientists could create ne vaccine on medicine to cure many patients thanks to these genes. Another reason why people should use expenditure on wild animal is to preserve biodiversity. Some of the animals are essential for human well-being. If they do not exist on earth in the future, the survival of human can be threatened. For example, if bees disappear, people can only survive for about 3 years according to researches.

In conclusion, people should consider carefully about the quantity of money and time invested in society and wildlife.