当前位置:雅思无忧 > 雅思写作雅思写作 > 正文

雅思写作6.5分习得之环境污染谁之责?

更新:2023年01月28日 09:06 雅思无忧

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核,综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力,实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说,也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思写作6.5分习得之环境污染谁之责?,希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题,敬请关注。
雅思写作6.5分习得之环境污染谁之责?

(范文分析可可原创,转载请注明出处。) Some people think that companies and individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up pollution that they have caused. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 有些人认为*应该解决污染问题,有些人认为*环境污染物的个人和公司有承担起清理的责任。你的看法是什么? Pollution, ranging from black *okes in major cities to Ozone layer in Antarctic ocean, has been presented to us. Its prevalence has also generated a controversial issue about who should pay for the debt as a result of it. It is argued by some that business and the general public should take responsibility instead of government. I personally agree with this statement for two reasons. 开篇亮出自己的观点,认为导致环境污染的个人和组织有责任清理污染物,解决环境污染问题。 The cleaning up campaign will be more thorough if individuals and businesses pay those pollution bills. As research have indicated, the majority of pollutions in the world are produced by those profit-maximizing business and individual industrial liquid public. Therefore, it would be a sound lesson for them to memorize if they were asked to pay for the cleaning fees. More importantly, the underlying left over in the future. (正面说理)事实证明,如果*出污染的个人和组织能够负责解决污染的话,会让污染得到全面而深入的解决。 Moreover, direct debit out of those enterprises and citizens' pocket would be more efficient in controlling their anti-environmental behaviour from economic viewpoint. As commonly recognized, the majority of government revenue is from the taxpayers including businesses and individual taxpayers, therefore the money paid to clean up pollution bills will be, in some senses, from those people. Nevertheless, government tax revenue can not be used only on this field, it is very likely that the amount of money being used on pollution control is well planned in the beginning stage of government budget planning, which may be fairly *all. In comparison with direct payment from those business and individual stakeholders involved, the payment approach through government suffers from the downside which is promarily concerned about inadequate amount of money available to environmental control. (从反面论证)从经济的角度看了,尽管个人和组织都纳税给*,一定程度上说,*有责任出面解决污染问题,但是个人和组织上缴给*的税收还有很多更需要的地方,用于解决环境污染问题的资金只是*预算的很小一部分。*用于解决清理污染物是有限的。 To sum up, in terms of above-mentioned causes, I strongly believe that more through and effective outcome will occur if individual businesses and citizens shoulder the responsiblity. 总结,如果个人和组织能够付起由自身导致的环境污染问题,那么环境污染物的清理和环境污染的解决会更有效和全面。

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/),了解更多雅思考试新消息,新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明:文章内容来自网络,如有侵权请及时联系删除。
推荐阅读
标签 - 专题
  鲁ICP备18049789号-14

2022雅思无忧网版权所有 All right reserved. 版权所有

警告:未经本网授权不得转载、摘编或利用其它方式使用上述作品