培训学校雅思作文怎么写求学术类雅思小作文结构

更新：2023年03月18日 18:04 雅思无忧

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了培训学校雅思作文怎么写求学术类雅思小作文结构，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。
培训学校雅思作文怎么写求学术类雅思小作文结构

雅思作文怎么练

第一阶段：语言总结+熟练+自由运用

大多数考生平时自由练习的情况下，可以有比较充裕的时间进行思考选择词汇或句型结构，所以平时写的作文质量还可以，可是由于在考场当中在高度集中完成听力和阅读之后，大多人的思维已经呈现疲劳状态，加上时间的限制，平时练习的水平并没有办法完全发挥，所以绝大多数考生反馈很多词汇和句型都想不起来使用。因此，在临考前必须一定要量化自己的语言，从平时上课的笔记，看过的资料和书籍中总结：

1)词汇：形容词和副词为主，其次动词(因为大多时候形容词和副词在使用的时候不太容易受语境的限制，可是动词在掌握上必须考虑及物或不及物，和相应的具体范围)

2)短语：形容词性短语，介词短语和动词短语多总结(因为短语使用简单)

比如：cater to *意思就是满足某人

The government will do whatever it takes to cater to the demands of its citizens.

3)句型：功能性语法结构为主

So + adj + be + 名词+ that +句子(结果)

So effective are the measures taken by the government that traffic pressure has been successfully alleviated.

那么这样的词汇，短语和句型要准备多少呢?小编认为准备因人而异，可能需要几轮，但是一共加在一起应该少于50个(词+短语+句型)，最后集中选取使用范围最大和比较好的语言。

其次，就是熟练并保证可以自由支配和运用。任何语言的使用都需要熟悉，但是由于我们前期精选的语料并不多只有最多50个，所以必须要保证每个的使用精准和准确。

最后，变成自己的语言。把2021-2021年考过的大作文题目列出，然后看题目想观点或相应的有关内容，对比自己总结的语料，看能写出多少内容，这个过程非常枯燥，但是确实具体有效。

以上就是前期语言的总结阶段，其实就是找出自己的语料库，量化语言的过程，考生只有用自己熟悉和和常用的语言才不容易产生错误，这是控制语言输出的最好办法!

第二阶段：总结大作文的类型和具体题型的语篇结构

比如：如何能够有效的论证“利大于弊”，这是需要自己通过上课和复习来进行一一总结的，上课只不过是系统的听了一遍，但是要自己多归纳多总结找出便于自己掌握知识的方式。

小编建议可以列表格，比较每种不同题型，比如

类型审题论证第一段主体结尾

在国外学习，列表格来帮助文科学习是常见的方式，它可以有效的总结抽象内容的相同和不同，对于知识的理解帮助很大。

第三阶段：就是实战演练

随意选去大作文题目，不要自己有倾向，因为大多数考生平时练习作文多选择自己比较熟悉的话题和内容训练，可是无人知道考试当天的具体题目，因此要做到练习题目的广度，如果这个过程中对于某些题目没有想法或观点，可以参考一下范文或线上的内容，但是千万别记英文，一定要记住汉语内容。用自己的语言表达。

在演练过程中把前期总结的语料，放在作文练习本的左边，先想观点和论证内容，然后观察是否可以通过总结的某些语料表达出来，也就是写每篇文章尽可能多地使用自己总结的语言。这样就有效的把自己准备的语言用在作文中。在练习过程中第1-第3篇可能花费时间最多，要差不多一个半小时左右，这是一个熟悉的过程;然后从第4-第6篇，由于方法熟悉了，所以时间会有效降低到50-60分钟;最好从第7-第10篇时间将会有效控制在30-40分钟。越写越熟悉，并且可以高效的使用好的语言，这才是雅思写作复习的王中之道!量化自身语言，高效使用好结构，大大降低语言错误的发生!

‘university subjects'

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.

There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.

In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.

In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have right to study whatever they like.

参考翻译

人们对选择大学应该学习多少学生有不同的看法。虽然有些人认为，这将是更好的学生被迫进入某些关键学科领域，我相信每个人都应该能够学习的过程中，他们的选择。

人们认为大学应该只提供将来有用的科目的原因是多方面的。他们可以断言，医学、工程学和信息技术等大学课程比某些艺术学位更有益处。从个人的角度来看，可以认为，这些课程提供更多的就业机会，职业发展，更好的工资，因此提高生活质量的学生谁带他们。在社会层面上，迫使人们选择特定的大学科目，*可以确保任何知识和技能差距的经济覆盖。最后，着眼于高等教育的技术可能会导致新发明，经济增长和更大的未来繁荣。

尽管有这些观点，我认为大学生应该可以自由选择他们喜欢的学习领域。在我看来，社会将受益更多，如果我们的学生对他们所学的热情。此外，没有人能真正预测哪些领域的知识将是最有用的.社会，在未来，它可能是雇主开始重视创造性思维能力以上的实际或技术技能。如果是这样的话，也许我们需要更多的艺术，历史和哲学的学生比科学或技术。

总之，尽管大学只专注于最有用的学科似乎是明智的，但我个人更喜欢现行的制度，即人们有权学习任何他们喜欢的东西。

;

求学术类雅思小作文结构

下面以剑桥模拟题第五套Test two Task one 为例，看看小作文的写作内容。
The first bar chart compares the percentage of reasons for study according to age of students, while the second one indicates the percentage of employer support by age group in terms of time off and help with fees.
As can be seen clearly, there is a gradual decrease with age in study for career, decreasing from as high as 80%, the top, under 26 to short of 20% of those over 49. In stark contrast, the percentage of students studying for interest increases steadily/ significantly from 10% for the youngest to 70%, the peak, for over 49 group, over three times of that of study for career. It is noticeable that the two motivations draw even at 40% for 40-49 year olds.
It is apparent that the youngest age group under 26 receives the most support from their employers, at approximately 60%. However, this sponsoring reduces *oothly to the bottom at roughly 30% of the middle age 30-39, before ascending remarkably to 41% again for those over 49.
In conclusion, it is likely that young people mainly study for career so they get the more support from their employers. （189 words）

从上面可以看出，第一段通常是直接点题，改写题目就可以了。主体通常分为2-3段，主要是数据的描述和比较，如果是两个图的话，一图一段就可以了；如果是单图的话，需要按照比较的层次进行分段。最后一段对图表进行总结或总的概述就可以了。

关于教育的雅思作文及分析

教育是雅思写作非常爱考的话题了，话不多说，看看我给大家分享的关于教育的雅思作文及分析。

雅思大作文教育类话题

1. 教育应该包括哪些内容

母题：It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions?

提示：本题围绕教育的两大功能来展开(个人与社会)，准备好这篇文章，即可应付教育类话题中的最大分支―教育的功能，做到以不变应万变。对于社会角度，可以从促进经济发展、增加社会流动性(social mobility)、维护社会稳定这几个方面来展开，对于个人，可以写改变思维模式、有利于就业和便利生活来写。

子题：大学应当教授理论知识还是实践技能?大学的是应当把学生培养成合格的公民还是让他们自己得益?准备未来职业最好的方法是上大学还是尽快离校积累工作经验 ?大学要不要扩招?中学阶段应当提供通才教育还是专才教育?要不要延长义务教育年限?要不要让农村地区的学生更容易上学?老师要教学生如何判断是非吗?

2. 学校的科目谁来选择

母题：Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion.

提示：这类题目采取的策略就是“双批判”，因为题目中提供的两种选择往往都是错误的。

子题1：*选课or 老师选课?学生选择所有的科目or根据兴趣自行选择?

子题2：只有学术科目重要，体育和音乐这样的课不重要，你同意吗?要不要学国际新闻?要不要学历史?要不要中学阶段就学习外语?要不要学数学哲学这类的科目?

提示：子题2与母题联系不大，需要准备这些科目各自的优点。

3. 什么样的教学方式最好

母题：Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

提示：远程教育最大的好处，就在于三个any：anybody, anywhere, any time. 缺点是缺乏师生之间以及学生之间的interaction, 缺乏教师的moral guidance, 因为没有体育课且久坐电脑前，会引发健康问题。

子题：私立学校好不好? 留学好不好?要不要分快慢班?小组学习还是单独学习好?

4. 谁来为学费*单

母题：Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university education only benefit the students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

提示：这些话题都有一个共同的特征：高等教育只对学生自己有好处，因此学生应当自行为高等教育*单。这类题目的写法非常有规律，先驳斥这种理由，再交代学生自己支付学费的后果就可以了。

子题：*要为学生*单吗?(缺点是给*带来经济负担，这类话题写法和其它 *类话题一样)

5. 家庭教育

母题：Some people say that children should obey the rules of their parents and teachers, while other people think children will not be well-prepared for their * life if they are given too much control. Discuss in both sides and give your opinion.

提示：写一下各自的好处就可以了，最后的结论是早年的时候要教授他们明辨是非，对于做错的事情要惩罚，但是也要适可而止让其兴趣爱好得到自由发展。

子题：穷人家的孩子是否早当家?家长是否应该为五岁小孩的犯罪负责?要不要把小孩趁早送到学校去?老师对儿童的智力和社会发展所起的作用大于家长吗?同龄人压力(peer pressure)的利弊?

雅思写作教育类话题思路讲解

题目分析：students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources(eg.internet or TV) do you agree or disagree?

这类题目又多次改头换面地出现在考场中，所以大家对于这种频繁光顾的话题一定要认真复习。没准你就可以通过通过再现练习或者课堂的方式在考场上斩获作文的高分。

文章结构第一段：开头段，引出自己的观点，即可以从老师身上学到更多的知识。

第二段：第一个分论点，认为学习不仅仅是学习知识的简单传递，而且还是师生间的互动。

第三段：第二个分论点，认为从老师身上不仅可以学到知识，而且老师可以为学生提供监管。第四段：驳论段，说明在学生也可以从其它方面资源地方学习。第五段：自然结尾，重申主题。

范文：

The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology(尖端科技) usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge(学习知识). Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent(支持者) of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other resources.Study, to some degrees, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procedure of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In theconventional teaching and learning mode(传统的教学和学习模式), teachers and students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students’ shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored(量体裁衣的，有针对性的)to their needs.It is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craft*en(匠人，工匠) who only impart knowledge(传递知识) but also serve as a supervisor or a guardian.

This is especially true in the case where students are less self-disciplined (自律的)and are inclined to go astray (误入歧途)without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, others resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted due to a host of irrelevant information,(不相关信息) which will undermine (一点点削弱)their learning efficiency and make students learn less.It is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of (很多)knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity.

They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places(偏远地区)where the teaching resources are not so abundant (充足的)as that in more developed regions. However, other learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role (主导地位)played by teachers.To sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from whom the student can gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.

雅思大作文教育类话题范文

题目：Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

范文：

Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.

Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching. Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.

I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only ― changes should also be made in society as a whole, including education at the pre-university level. Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.

On the other hand, if the last 1.0% of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority’ sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.