雅思作文审题技巧 雅思作文：是否应当限制私人小汽车

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文审题技巧 雅思作文：是否应当限制私人小汽车，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

雅思作文审题技巧

　　很多技能的学习，都有一个从不了解到了解，从陌生到熟悉的过程。对于以前没有接触过写作或者练习写作不多的考生来说，拿到一个作文题目往往不知道从何下手。为解决这个问题，下面给大家提供一些练习写作中的基本思路和写作步骤。本章字数虽然不多，但作用非常关键，希望读者认真体会并掌握其中思路。

　　拿到题目首先要认真审题。很多考生认为只要是把字数写够，用了一些比较高级的词汇和复合句就算完成了任务。其实，这种想法指导下的写作在实际考试中很容易使考生忽视把握论证的方向，造成写作扣题不严密，论点表述不完整，更严重还会导致跑题。最近雅思作文题目中争论的焦点难以把握。很多考生看到题目中认识的单词，然后就发挥自己想象，天马行空下笔就写。但是这样的作文无论语言质量多高，也拿不到好的分数。只有把握题目争论重心，才能保证论证有的放矢，获得高分。

　　例子 1、
　　Air transport is increasingly being used to export many types of fruits and vegetables to countries where those plants can’t grow or are out of season. Some say that it is a good thing, but others consider that such use of air transport can’t be justified. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 空运各种蔬菜和水果到不出产这些蔬菜水果的国家或者到这些东西已经过季了的国家越来越司空见惯，有人赞同，有人反对，请评价双方论点并给出自己的看法。

　　题目分析：
　　这篇作文为2004年9月18日A类雅思考题。题目表面是谈论蔬菜水果和空运的话题，实际上考生需要明白蔬菜、水果作为食品属于商品，商品的一个特点就是要满足不同层次的消费需要。作为一种高成本的服务方式，空运满足的是高消费水平人群，而其他低成本运输服务方式满足的是普通消费水平人群。明白了这一点，就很容易分别解释、评价两种对立论点，最后进行总结，提出自己看法。

　　很多经验不足的考生审题时思路往往不清楚，抓不住问题的主要和本质方面。针对本题的飞机和蔬菜，有的考生可能会描写飞机运输的便利性，然后联想到飞机的发明、对人类的贡献等等和题目关联性很小的话题上，也可能会有考生花费很多篇幅讨论蔬菜和水果对人体健康的重要性，诸如此类的论点都属于跑题。

　　例子 2、Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories with their employees to the countryside. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 交通和住房是城市的主要问题，把大公司和工厂及员工移到郊区可能解决该问题，你同意这样的看法吗？

　　题目分析：
　　该题目提出大城市交通堵塞和居住紧张问题，建议解决方案是把大公司和员工转移到郊区。根据我们的生活经验和知识，造成上述问题原因可能有很多，文中并没有提供任何证据说明大公司和其员工是造成问题的主要原因。考生可以提出一些其他原因证明这个解决方案可能不会奏效。这些原因可以是：交通设施落后old transport infrastructure、交通管理水平低下poor traffic control、城市人口增长过快 fast population growth、住房供应不足 inadequate housing supply等。如果考生不深入思考这个题目可能会提出类似以下错误论点：

雅思作文：是否应当限制私人小汽车？

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated non-specialist audience on the following topic.

The private motor vehicle has greatly improved individual freedom of movement. Moreover, the automobile has become a status symbol. Yet the use of private motor vehicles has contributed to some of today’s most serious problems. How can the use of private motor vehicles be reduced?

You should write at least 250 words.
You should you your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Topic words:
Private motor vehicles
privately owned cars
Serious problems eg. Pollution, traffic jams, accidents

Task words:
How can … be reduced?
Note: answer question “how can…” not “Should the use of cars be reduced?” The task is in the final question, not in the preceding sentences.

The answer must:
Suggest some ways to stop people from using their cars so much, eg. Government measures, education campaigns.

Sample Essay

The private motor vehicle has given us a freedom our ancestors could not dream about. We can travel swiftly, and usually safely, over the roads which have been built to accommodate our cars. People can display their wealth by driving a car which may cost as much as another person’s home. - Introduction: advantages of cars (brief)

Sadly the car has become a disadvantage as well as a boom. The car pollutes the atmosphere, may be involved in serious accidents, and by its very numbers blocks roads and chokes cities. How can we reduce its use? - Brief statement of problem: disadvantages of cars

The car is only desirable if we can use it easily, so we might begin by reducing access to parking spaces in the cities and simultaneously increasing the quality and availability of public transport. Cars could be banned form certain parts of the city, thus forcing people to walk or to use public transport. - Ideas for cutting the number of cars

The expense of buying and running a car can be raised. If the motorist is faced with a high purchase price, high road tax, high insurance premiums and substantial fines he or she may reconsider the purchase. A corresponding reduction in the price of public transport would help this financial argument against car ownership.

Neither of these arguments will sway the super rich who can afford the status cars, but it would perhaps encourage them to look at other ways of demonstrating their wealth. However we do it, reducing the number of cars on the road will reduce the problems of pollution and the congestion which can bring cities to a standstill. - Conclusions: states the benefits of reducing the number of cars

Remember: this sample answer is one of several satisfactory ways to answer the question. Other essays which respond to the writing task would also be acceptable.

Source: Prepare for IELTS, by Vanessa Todd & Penny Cameron, 1996, UTS, Australia. For non-profit educational use only.

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。