雅思作文越复杂越好 雅思作文修改：学生分班问题

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文越复杂越好 雅思作文修改：学生分班问题，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

雅思作文越复杂越好？中国学生常见的四大误区

1. 误解一：句子结构越复杂，得分越高

许多考生在考雅思写作的时候，拼了命的把准备的各种句型拐弯抹角地套在一起，窃以为考官在阅卷的时候必会为自己强大的语法功底所折服，进而给个六分。可是，雅思作文考试毕竟不是语法考试。一篇好雅思文章应该流畅自然，而不是生搬硬套，无中生有。这种费尽心机写下的“高分”句子往往会弄巧成拙，影响文章整体的自然性和流畅性。

2. 误解二：使用的单词越生僻，得分越高

有些考生在学到雅思写作要换词后，每次练习写作都不惜花大把时间把简洁的词汇Google成百年难得一遇的生僻词，然后死死记下，当作替换词用到考试中，以博考官注意，达到画龙点睛之效，然而结果却往往事与愿违。其实，单词不求复杂，要的是贴切。像是经济学人上的学术性文章上，也常会用到cut来描述价格、经费上的消减。这不但不会让人觉的低俗幼稚，反而能让人觉得干脆利落，毫不留情。而且，用复杂的单词极易拼写错，更让考官对之反感。同时，Google来的甚至是字典上的单词往往会翻译得不准确，一旦使用就会闹出笑话。例如褒词贬用，贬词褒用，让考官完全抓不准考生的观点和立场，影响得分。单词的恰当使用时一个学习积累的过程，如果没有足够的把握，务必慎用。

3. 误解三：写作文要加标题

英国考试有一个惯例，写作文时不需要加标题，直接写正文就行。加标题纯属画蛇添足，而且这个标题有时可能涵盖太大，整篇文章都不能很好的驾驭这个标题；有的时候又可能包含太少，一个标题只覆盖文中一两段的内容；有时甚至标题的意思与文章主题南辕北辙，各奔东西误导考官。所以写雅思作文时，切忌加标题。

4. 误解四：小作文每条数据都要描写

雅思官方有明确指出，大作文占的分量要比小作文大，而且考官在评分改卷时也以大作文为主。但有时考生在写作文时，把握不住时间，小作文写得过于详细，最后留给大作文的时间还不足半小时，这样就基本over了。而小作文写得久，就是因为很多考生都在千方百计地把图中出现的所有数据写入小作文中。最后，不但小作文的流畅自然被破坏，留给大作文的写作时间也所剩无几，进退维谷。其实，小作文的数据并不需要全数描写，这不单是为了节约时间给大作文，更是为了保障小作文的浑然天成，避免出现流水账的情况，以给小作文加分。

雅思作文修改：学生分班问题

The notions of tracking and ability grouping have been contentious topics since the 1970s. Should students be grouped according to their academic ability?

There is much discussion these days about the notions of tracking and ability grouping since the 1970s. Some people believe that it is damaging to students’ development, while others harbor the opinion that it is beneficial for them. From my point of view, I am definitely in agreement with the latter opinion.

In the first instance, it is easier for teachers to teach according to their academic ability. Teachers should not worry about the students who get lower grades will not understand what they said（teach） during the class anymore. If teachers spend more time explaining for the students with lower ability, it is a waste of time for the students who has understood. It is unfair.

Secondly, it is the best way to study together for the students with the same level. They can discuss, exchange their ideas and deal with problems together. However, if now there are some students with lower levels among them, the students may be too shy to express their views, for they are afraid of being laughed at. Perhaps, those students would become more and more introverted resulting from this. Furthermore, the competition between students with higher levels is so fierce that they should try all the way out to keep their positions in the class, imaging it, can the rest students adapt to this situation? I think it is likely to have an unfavorable influence on their confidence.

Even though some people think it is rather bad to distinct the students, if students can benefit from this, I strongly suggest that we can take it into account.

All in all, in my opinion, I am in high favor that students should be grouped according to their ability because this can help students develop better in the future.

这篇文章整体结构很清晰，各部分处理的也不错

缺点在于：

第一，两段立论段落论述的比较单薄

你分成了两段，对学生，对老师

如果让我给你建议，我会这样分段：

1. 对学生学习方面的影响

2. 对学生心理层面的影响

这样可能会更有深度

第二，开头段的直接引入太简单了，改为大范围会好一点，这是我们上课讲的一个重点

With the rapid social development, there are many arguments about education, among which the notions of tracking and ability grouping since the 1970s could be one of the most remarkable one. Quite a few people believe that it is damaging to students’ development, but in practice, i hold the opinion that it is beneficial for them.

如果我来打分的话：band 5/5.5

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。