名师解答：为什么你的雅思作文不到六分 雅思作文修改：学生分班问题

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了名师解答：为什么你的雅思作文不到六分 雅思作文修改：学生分班问题，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

名师解答：为什么你的雅思作文不到六分

本文由雅思名师庄子专供无忧雅思网作品，转载须注明作者和出处“无忧雅思网”。

同学:

你好!

你在博客评论中说考了两次雅思, 作文都没有到达6分. 而你阅读了不少雅思写作参考书, 你自己也肯定你的结构和参考书上是一致的. 你自己已经回答了你的问题.

你问我为什么你没有考到6分. 参考书可能就是一个致命的原因. 你阅读的参考书有问题. 我没有阅读你说的写作参考书, 所以不对参考书进行评价. 但是根据我的教学经验, 你是读错了书籍. 这好比你发烧了, 就自己随便吃药. 虽然你吃的药物名字也是退烧的, 但是导致发烧的原因太多, 每个药物针对性有限.

写作不能靠着阅读参考书提高, 否则的话我早出版写作书籍了. 出版书籍可以赚钱, 扬名, 但是教学十年多, 为什么我不出书呢? 就是我认为写作参考书实际上更多的是商业而非学术. 北大清华北外南大等等高校内英文高手如云, 随便拉出来几个教授, 水平都比任何培训机构的所谓金牌名师要高出很多, 但是这些教授为什么不出版写作书籍呢? 道理很简单, 大家都知道, 写作不能靠着一本参考书来解决, 而且参考书在很多情况下是有害的.

我不能只告诉你参考书有害, 我还要告诉你什么是有好处的.

我想请你思考以下几个问题:

1. 雅思在过去的三年内都考了什么题目?

2. 这些考题有什么共同特征?

3. 虽然题目每次都有变化, 这些变化背后不变的测试点究竟是什么?

4. 你是否知道要考核你什么语言技能?

5. 针对要考的语言技能, 你做出怎样的应对?

请你思考这些问题, 然后请你大量阅读英文原版的论文, 而不是参考书. 比较容易获得的英文原版论文有TOEFL的阅读理解, GRE 阅读理解, 当然GMAT也不错, 如果这些文章, 你拿出来认真分析十篇, 我想你怎么也不会考不到6分.

说实在的, 雅思作文9分也不过是一种短期训练可以达到的游戏而已. 我没有更多认真研究你的具体问题, 给你提出的解决方案比较笼统, 希望你自己多思多问.

祝你进步

庄子

点击查看原文》》》

雅思作文修改：学生分班问题

The notions of tracking and ability grouping have been contentious topics since the 1970s. Should students be grouped according to their academic ability?

There is much discussion these days about the notions of tracking and ability grouping since the 1970s. Some people believe that it is damaging to students’ development, while others harbor the opinion that it is beneficial for them. From my point of view, I am definitely in agreement with the latter opinion.

In the first instance, it is easier for teachers to teach according to their academic ability. Teachers should not worry about the students who get lower grades will not understand what they said（teach） during the class anymore. If teachers spend more time explaining for the students with lower ability, it is a waste of time for the students who has understood. It is unfair.

Secondly, it is the best way to study together for the students with the same level. They can discuss, exchange their ideas and deal with problems together. However, if now there are some students with lower levels among them, the students may be too shy to express their views, for they are afraid of being laughed at. Perhaps, those students would become more and more introverted resulting from this. Furthermore, the competition between students with higher levels is so fierce that they should try all the way out to keep their positions in the class, imaging it, can the rest students adapt to this situation? I think it is likely to have an unfavorable influence on their confidence.

Even though some people think it is rather bad to distinct the students, if students can benefit from this, I strongly suggest that we can take it into account.

All in all, in my opinion, I am in high favor that students should be grouped according to their ability because this can help students develop better in the future.

这篇文章整体结构很清晰，各部分处理的也不错

缺点在于：

第一，两段立论段落论述的比较单薄

你分成了两段，对学生，对老师

如果让我给你建议，我会这样分段：

1. 对学生学习方面的影响

2. 对学生心理层面的影响

这样可能会更有深度

第二，开头段的直接引入太简单了，改为大范围会好一点，这是我们上课讲的一个重点

With the rapid social development, there are many arguments about education, among which the notions of tracking and ability grouping since the 1970s could be one of the most remarkable one. Quite a few people believe that it is damaging to students’ development, but in practice, i hold the opinion that it is beneficial for them.

如果我来打分的话：band 5/5.5

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。