雅思口语写作观点词汇语料：房屋建筑新航道王渊源、李鑫谈雅思口语真经(下)

更新：2023年04月14日 22:36 雅思无忧

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思口语写作观点词汇语料：房屋建筑新航道王渊源、李鑫谈雅思口语真经(下)，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。
雅思口语写作观点词汇语料：房屋建筑新航道王渊源、李鑫谈雅思口语真经(下)

雅思口语写作观点词汇语料：房屋建筑

其实再好的雅思范文，也只能告诉你怎样写好一篇文章的骨架，而要做到有血有肉，言之有物，则要靠大量的话题观点及相关词汇的支撑。本文分享的话题观点语料是：Housing and architecture。注意文末还附上数道相关雅思写作真题供练习。

Housing and Architecture住房与建筑

State/council housing 公共住房

In some countries the government provides state or council housing

This helps people who cannot afford to buy their own house

It can be argued that state housing creates dependence on the government

People should be rely on the government to look after them

People have no incentive to earn money and buy their own home Council properties are often made with cheap, poor-quality materials.

Old Buildings 老建筑

Historic buildings are part of a country’s heritage

They should be protected

Old buildings are often considered to be works or art

They give character to cities and attract tourists

They show us how people lived in the past

We identify countries by architectural symbols like the pyramids in Egypt

Governments should spend money on looking after historic buildings

They need regular repairs and maintenance

New buildings should be designed to complement them

Modern/green buildings 现代/绿色建筑

Modern buildings should be designed to be environmentally friendly

They should use less energy and produce less waste

Modern insulation can make houses more energy-efficient

Solar and wind power can be used to generate electricity

Rainwater and waste water can be recycled and used to flush toilets.

Modern glass buildings take advantage if natural light

相关雅思历史真题

1.It is more important for a building to serve its purposes than to look beautiful. Architects do not need to worry about whether it is a real work of art. Do you agree or disagree?

2.Some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?