牛人总结的雅思作文评分标准

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了牛人总结的雅思作文评分标准，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

牛人总结的雅思作文评分标准

为大家介绍一位牛人网友在复习IELTS剑桥系列时总结的雅思考试作文评分标准,总结的依据来自该系列中考官的评语，比较科学实用，供广大烤鸭们参考。

雅思考试作文评分标准Grades Standard:

1. The main argument are relevant and the writer's point of view need be clear.

2. The writer's point of view needs many ideas that deal with the actual issues and to be consistent.

3. The prompt could not be copied directly in the response and the words can not less than 250 (at look).

4. There are various range of language in the sentence.

5. The sentence cannot be only simple in all.

6. A range of structure need depend on good control of punctuation and grammar.

ps: Examiner is interested in visual example. if there are some appropriate examples to support your view, your marks will not be low.

雅思考试作文评分标准第一点总是观点问题，一般得4分的都是观点不清晰;第二点提到理由，理由必须要支持观点，理由写的混乱的话，分数肯定不高;第三点是字数问题，一般考官不会数的，差不多就ok了(这是我猜的)但是如果你有多次抄袭题目的原话的话，那他就会不厌其烦的数了，而且抄袭的部分不算，只算剩下的。这三点是大家必须做到的，否则5分都拿不到。

雅思考试作文评分标准第四是语言的组织，也就是连接词用的要恰当，看上去是个小问题，但是这点非常重要，要体现出逻辑表达次序，如果乱用，考官的逻辑思维也会混乱，导致看不懂或不理解你要说什么，不能正常往下阅读，这会让考官非常难受，你想想你让他难受，他会让你好受吗?但是他又不知道你在哪里，就算知道你在哪里也不能把k你一顿阿，就算能k你一顿，也不一定打得过你啊，要知道考官大多都是老头老太，但是这口气一定要出的呀，最后倒霉的还是你的分数(晕，撤远了)

雅思考试作文评分标准第五点句子不能全是简单句，当然简单句看上去容易，也比较容易理解，也不会错，但是在那些老奶奶老爷爷眼里就像是他们在上幼儿园的小孙子小孙女写出来的东西，只是些幼儿园水平的东西(在这里顺便讲件事，大家知道ielts的题目在美国和英联邦国家中是什么等级吗?ielts分听说读写4部分，其中阅读和写作是他们12年级的水平，口语的CueCard部分是他们幼儿园的游戏，他们没有听力，这些时我侄子告诉我的，他在美国，今年刚刚12年级，这次他回来，我给他做了剑桥的题目，他告诉我这些是他们现在这水平做的东西)可想而知，幼儿园水平的东西，分数也只能在幼儿园的水平。

雅思考试作文评分标准第六点就是句子的结构了，这点需要注意的是语法和标点，在我们看来标点并不重要，但是剑桥范文的评语中都有punctuation这词，而且和grammar并列，说明这和语法一样重要，而且也是评分的一个标准，不过，这些都是最后出现的，也就是说相对上面5条来说不怎么重要，在我国英语学习和考试中都是语法为重点，而恰恰人家并不看重它，这让我国许多语法很好的同学，有些英雄无用武之地吧!不过学好语法也不是件坏事。我说不重要只是和上面5条比哦，也别太轻敌哦，毕竟也是评分标准之一，特别在时态的应用上要注意，如果乱用时态让考官进入时间隧道出不来的话，那你就再准备1450把他解救出来吧!

雅思作文：是否应当限制私人小汽车？

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated non-specialist audience on the following topic.

The private motor vehicle has greatly improved individual freedom of movement. Moreover, the automobile has become a status symbol. Yet the use of private motor vehicles has contributed to some of today’s most serious problems. How can the use of private motor vehicles be reduced?

You should write at least 250 words.
You should you your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Topic words:
Private motor vehicles
privately owned cars
Serious problems eg. Pollution, traffic jams, accidents

Task words:
How can … be reduced?
Note: answer question “how can…” not “Should the use of cars be reduced?” The task is in the final question, not in the preceding sentences.

The answer must:
Suggest some ways to stop people from using their cars so much, eg. Government measures, education campaigns.

Sample Essay

The private motor vehicle has given us a freedom our ancestors could not dream about. We can travel swiftly, and usually safely, over the roads which have been built to accommodate our cars. People can display their wealth by driving a car which may cost as much as another person’s home. - Introduction: advantages of cars (brief)

Sadly the car has become a disadvantage as well as a boom. The car pollutes the atmosphere, may be involved in serious accidents, and by its very numbers blocks roads and chokes cities. How can we reduce its use? - Brief statement of problem: disadvantages of cars

The car is only desirable if we can use it easily, so we might begin by reducing access to parking spaces in the cities and simultaneously increasing the quality and availability of public transport. Cars could be banned form certain parts of the city, thus forcing people to walk or to use public transport. - Ideas for cutting the number of cars

The expense of buying and running a car can be raised. If the motorist is faced with a high purchase price, high road tax, high insurance premiums and substantial fines he or she may reconsider the purchase. A corresponding reduction in the price of public transport would help this financial argument against car ownership.

Neither of these arguments will sway the super rich who can afford the status cars, but it would perhaps encourage them to look at other ways of demonstrating their wealth. However we do it, reducing the number of cars on the road will reduce the problems of pollution and the congestion which can bring cities to a standstill. - Conclusions: states the benefits of reducing the number of cars

Remember: this sample answer is one of several satisfactory ways to answer the question. Other essays which respond to the writing task would also be acceptable.

Source: Prepare for IELTS, by Vanessa Todd & Penny Cameron, 1996, UTS, Australia. For non-profit educational use only.

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。