剑桥5雅思听力原文 哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢

雅思听力是很多朋友有关注的类型，那么剑桥5雅思听力原文 哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢，雅思无忧为大家带来了相关文章，希望给大家提供参考。

请问剑桥雅思听力真题讲解

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。选择留学是人生重要的决策之一，而作为您的指导，我非常高兴能为您提供最准确的留学解答和规划。无论您的问题是关于考试准备、专业选择、申请流程还是学校信息，我都在这里为您解答。更多留学资讯和学校招生介绍，欢迎随时访问。
对于很多准备考雅思的同学来说，不知道准备得怎么样了呢？今天就和小钟老师一起来了解一下剑桥雅思听力真题讲解：　Which three topics do this term’s study skills workshops cover？

首先我们来看一个例子：
例1 剑6 Test 4 Qs 28-30
Which three topics do this term’s study skills workshops cover？
A An introduction to the Internet
B How to carry out research for a dissertation
C Making good use of the whole range of library services
D Planning a dissertation
E Standard requirements when writing a dissertation
F Using the Internet when doing research
G What books and technical resources are available in the library
实际做题：
1）首先出现了library这个定位词，那么经历主要集中在C，G上。
原文：How to use the library’s resources. That includes everything， not just the print and the technical resources.
解题：通过同义转换可以得到答案C，或者G 选项所包含的technical resources被否定了，排除后也可以选择正确选项为C。
2）紧接着出现Internet这个定位词，马上把注意力转移到A，F上。
原文：The one on the Internet for beginners was last term. This term it’s finding research materials online.
解题：beginner 与 introduction 形成同义转换，但是时间点为上学期，作为干扰项排除后正确答案为F。
3）最后出现了dissertation这个定位词，那么B，D，E三选一就开始了。
原文：It’s a workshop on dissertation. What do you mean？ How to write one？ Er， no， it’s to do with academic writing conventions.
解题：文中问到，是怎么写一篇论文吗？回答不是的。故可以排除B，D，因为这两个选项是属于怎样写论文的，这样就可以得到正确答案E. 或者把writing conventions 与 standard requirements 做同义转换也可。
看过多选题后，我们再来看一个单选题的例子：
例2 剑7 Test 4 Q 32
In 1908， scientists in Japan
A made monosodium glutamate
B began using kombu
C identified glutamate
思路透析：
典型的雅思3选1单选题。经过审题后发现，A，C选项都为动词加名词的结构，而且名词都是glutamate，故这两个选项里出正确答案的几率很高。
实际做题：
首先出现了kombu这个定位词，但是并没有与1908这样一个时间形成匹配，故先排除B。
原文：...was actually discovered to be glutamate by scientists working there
解题：discover 与 identify 形成同义转换，答案为C

以上信息希望能帮助您在留学申请的道路上少走弯路。如果您还有更多问题或需要深入探讨，不要犹豫，您可以在我们的留学官方网站上找到更丰富的考试资讯、留学指导和*专家咨询服务。我们的团队始终站在您的角度，为您的留学梦想全力以赴。祝您申请顺利！

哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢

Nature or Nurture?

A) A few years ago. in one of the most fascinating and disturbing experiments in behavioral psychology. Stanley Milgram of Yale University tested 40 subjects from all walks of life for their willingness to obey instructions given by a 'leader' in a situation in which the subjects might feel a personal distaste for the actions they were called upon to perform. Specifically, Milgram told each volunteer 'teacher-subject' that the experiment was in the noble cause of education, and was designed to test whether or not punishing pupils for their mistakes would have a positive effect on the pupils' ability to learn.

B) Milgram's experimental set-up involved placing the teacher-subject before a panel of thirty switches with labels ranging from '15 volts of electricity (slight shock)' to '450 volts (danger - severe shock)' in steps of 15 volts each. The teacher-subject was told that whenever the pupil gave the wrong answer to a question, a shock was to be administered, beginning at the lowest level and increasing in severity with each successive wrong answer. The supposed 'pupil' was in reality an actor hired by Milgram to simulate receiving the shocks by emitting a spectrum of groans, screams and writhing together with an assortment of statements and expletives denouncing both the experiment and the experimenter. Milgram told the teacher-subject to ignore the reactions of the pupil, and to administer whatever level of shock was called for. as per the rule governing the experimental situation of the moment.

C) As the experiment unfolded, the pupil would deliberately give the wrong answers to questions posed by the teacher, thereby bringing on various electrical punishments, even up to the danger level of 300 volts and beyond. Many of the teacher-subjects balked at administering The higher levels of punishment, and turned to Milgram with questioning looks and/or complaints about continuing the experiment. In these situations, Milgram calmly explained that the teacher-subject was to ignore the pupil's cries for mercy and carry on with the experiment. If the subject was still reluctant to proceed, Milgram said that it was important for the sake of the experiment that the procedure be followed through to the end His final argument was, 'You have no other choice. You must go on." What Milgram was trying to discover was the number of teacher-subjects who would be willing to administer the highest levels of shock, even in the face of strong personal and moral revulsion against the rules and conditions of the experiment.

D) Prior to carrying out the experiment, Milgram explained his idea to a group of 39 psychiatrists and asked them to predict the average percentage of people in an ordinary population who would be willing to administer the highest shock level of 450 volts. The overwhelming consensus was that virtually all the teacher-subjects would refuse to obey the experimenter. The psychiatrists felt that 'most subjects would not go beyond 150 volts' and they further anticipated that only four per cent would go up to 300 volts. Furthermore, they thought that only a lunatic fringe of about one in 1.000 would give the highest shock of 450 volts.

E) What were the actual results? Well, over 60 per cent of the teacher-subjects continued to obey Milgram up to the 450-volt limit! In repetitions of the experiment in other countries, the percentage of obedient teacher-subjects was even higher, reaching 85 per cent in one country. How can we possibly account for this vast discrepancy between what calm, rational, knowledgeable people predict in the comfort of their study and what pressured, flustered, but cooperative teachers' actually do in the laboratory of real life?

F) One's first inclination might be to argue that there must be some sort of built-in animal aggression instinct that was activated by the experiment, and that Milgram's teacher-subjects were just following a genetic need to discharge this pent-up primal urge onto the pupil by administering the electrical shock. A modern hard-core sociobiologist might even go so far as to claim that this aggressive instinct evolved as an advantageous trait, having been of survival value to our ancestors in their struggle against the hardships of life on the plains and in the caves, ultimately finding its way into our genetic make-up as a remnant of our ancient animal ways.

G) An alternative to this notion of genetic programming is to see the teacher-subjects' actions as a result of the social environment under which the experiment was carried out. As Milgram himself pointed out. Most subjects in the experiment see their behaviour in a larger context that is benevolent and useful to society - the pursuit of scientific truth. The psychological laboratory has a strong claim to legitimacy and evokes trust and confidence in those who perform there. An action such as shocking a victim, which in isolation appears evil, acquires a completely different meaning when placed in this setting."

H) Thus, in this explanation the subject merges his unique personality and personal and moral code with that of larger institutional structures, surrendering individual properties like loyalty, self-sacrifice and discipline to the service of malevolent systems of authority.

I) Here we have two radically different explanations for why so many teacher-subjects were willing to forgo their sense of personal responsibility for the sake of an institutional authority figure. The problem for biologists, psychologists and anthropologists is to sort out which of these two polar explanations is more plausible. This, in essence, is the problem of modern sociobiology - to discover the degree to which hard-wired genetic programming dictates, or at least strongly biases, the interaction of animals and humans with their environment, that is, their behaviour. Put another way, sociobiology is concerned with elucidating the biological basis of all behaviour.

答案：
14. F
15. A
16. B
17. D
18. I
19. C
20. B
21. D
22. C
23. Not Given
24. True
25. False
26. False

剑桥雅思听力真题讲解

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
对于很多准备考雅思的同学来说，不知道准备得怎么样了呢？今天就和小钟老师一起来了解一下剑桥雅思听力真题讲解：　Which three topics do this term’s study skills workshops cover？

首先我们来看一个例子：
例1 剑6 Test 4 Qs 28-30
Which three topics do this term’s study skills workshops cover？
A An introduction to the Internet
B How to carry out research for a dissertation
C Making good use of the whole range of library services
D Planning a dissertation
E Standard requirements when writing a dissertation
F Using the Internet when doing research
G What books and technical resources are available in the library
实际做题：
1）首先出现了library这个定位词，那么经历主要集中在C，G上。
原文：How to use the library’s resources. That includes everything， not just the print and the technical resources.
解题：通过同义转换可以得到答案C，或者G 选项所包含的technical resources被否定了，排除后也可以选择正确选项为C。
2）紧接着出现Internet这个定位词，马上把注意力转移到A，F上。
原文：The one on the Internet for beginners was last term. This term it’s finding research materials online.
解题：beginner 与 introduction 形成同义转换，但是时间点为上学期，作为干扰项排除后正确答案为F。
3）最后出现了dissertation这个定位词，那么B，D，E三选一就开始了。
原文：It’s a workshop on dissertation. What do you mean？ How to write one？ Er， no， it’s to do with academic writing conventions.
解题：文中问到，是怎么写一篇论文吗？回答不是的。故可以排除B，D，因为这两个选项是属于怎样写论文的，这样就可以得到正确答案E. 或者把writing conventions 与 standard requirements 做同义转换也可。
看过多选题后，我们再来看一个单选题的例子：
例2 剑7 Test 4 Q 32
In 1908， scientists in Japan
A made monosodium glutamate
B began using kombu
C identified glutamate
思路透析：
典型的雅思3选1单选题。经过审题后发现，A，C选项都为动词加名词的结构，而且名词都是glutamate，故这两个选项里出正确答案的几率很高。
实际做题：
首先出现了kombu这个定位词，但是并没有与1908这样一个时间形成匹配，故先排除B。
原文：...was actually discovered to be glutamate by scientists working there
解题：discover 与 identify 形成同义转换，答案为C

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

以上就是雅思无忧为大家带来的剑桥5雅思听力原文 哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢，希望能帮助到大家，了解更多相关信息，敬请关注雅思无忧。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。