2021年6月8日雅思写作预测-舒杰

小作文：单押线图

大作文：女性服兵役，社会准则，低物价，个人与环计划，科技与农业生产，艺术的作用，动物园，根据学习成绩挑选学生，小组活动，大人对孩子的管制。

共计10篇，以下是部分参考范文，仅以研习为主，请勿背诵：）

l  根据成绩挑选学生

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic ability and others believe that students with different academic abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion. （B）

参考范文：

What is the more reasonable approach in distributing students has long sparked a fierce debate among the society. Some tend to support that students with different intelligence level should be edified together, whereas others strongly claim that *art children should be taught alone. To my perception, I reckon that the first manner is more grounded.

A combined education system contributes to the comprehensive children’s development. As indicated by the Bucket Theory, everyone possesses his respective strength as well as weakness. If students with different intellectual ability study together, they are meant to promote each other, since this effect is somewhat unconsciously undertaken during their interaction. Indeed, a student who scores A in all the school tests might find it demanding to appreciate arts or conduct handcraft, but he can learn it from his clas*ates under the co-education pattern. This can definitely meet the authentic purpose of the education, to cultivate a complete person instead of merely pursue the highest academic performance.

On the contrary, a separate education system only benefits a fraction of students. Admittedly, schools can realize the optimal resource allocation by arranging the most excellent teachers to teach the clever students but common teachers to deal with those less intellectual counterparts. However, such practice deprives students’ legal right to approach the equal teaching resources regardless their physical or intellectual development. Once those less clever students realize the fact that they are segmented for the sake of their intelligence, they will either study harder to squeeze into the higher group or bear the sense of inequality （even hatred） in mind since their childhood, but these manners are detrimental to the individual or social development.

To sum up, I am inclined towards the co-education with both clever and less intellectual students in the public school. However, private schools can have various trials if students themselves hold relevant demands, since these students pay extra tuition fees.

l  女性服兵役

In many countries, women are not able to join in the army to share equal basis with men, but some people think that women should be a member of the army, navy and air force.

To what extent do you agree or disagree? （A）

参考范文：

Perhaps the topic of female soldiers is one of the most frequently discussed issues, especially in modern society. Some people propose that women should share the same responsibility in assuming the military obligation. Personally, this statement can hardly appeal to me.

Initially, women are comparatively weak in physical strength to serve in the army. It is universally recognized that most military services are rather demanding, which require strong physical power as well as endurance to overcome those disadvantageous conditions. If we recruit women in the army merely for the dubious gender equality, their physical defects will probably lead to the mission failure. For instance, in those extremely hot but water absent desert areas, females will fail to survive, let alone accomplishing those tough tasks perfectly. Therefore, females might bring unnecessary loss in military actions.

Furthermore, females are not as mature as males in mentality. Obviously, scientists have already proven that most women think or make decision based on emotion rather than rationality. Indeed, females may deal with problems according to their preference or own value system, but such model will probably prevent them from acquiring the desired achievement. For instance, it is evidently difficult for women to torture those captured enemies to grab necessary but urgent military information. However, the whole group or larger unit, such as a city, will suffer tremendous damage owing to their inappropriate mercy in the battle.

Even though a fraction of women might surpass their male counterparts in the two elements mentioned above, it does not signify that all the women can equally join the military force.

To conclude, females are not suitable to join in the military service in the army, navy as well as air force. However, these units are suggested to enroll medical soldiers from women, which will definitely exert their merits。

低物价

People live in the society where consumer goods cheaper to buy.

Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages? （B-2）

参考范文：

Recently, the argument of low price increasingly attracts extensive public attention. Some tend to support that such phenomenon will bring more benefits, whereas others hold an opposite idea. Before presenting my perception, I intend to *yze this issue thoroughly.

Those who advocate the first view mainly possess the following reasons.

At the very beginning, positive low price contributes to the enhancement of social stability.

To be more precise, such cheaper goods allow people to buy more products under the same salary level, since most people’s buying depends on the price of goods. By owning more products, citizens would obtain more material satisfaction, thus promoting their sense of happiness. According to a social survey released by the China Daily 2021, 61.3% Chinese families were able to afford a digital camera to record their routine life. In addition，active low price can also further boost the technology booming in the society. Specifically, during the process of regular business competition, other producers will constantly reduce the product price to occupy their market share. Provided that they want to maintain the expected profits, they are required to improve the technology level to decrease the producing cost.

On the contrary, the second view sounds reasonable either. First of all, the negative low price is supposed to violate the legal rights of consumers and those regular manufacturers. When consumers purchase those illegally copied goods, they might lose the chance to experience the product performance, after sales service and other benefits brought by the authentic ones. Meanwhile, those manufacturers will result in the loss of many market shares, since those illegal copycats do not have to afford the expensive fees, including research & design cost, operating cost as well as advertising cost. Taking the newly launched Iphone 5 as the best example, even though the fake one is remarkably cheaper than the original, customers will never enjoy the high quality of the cell phone and those wonderful functions and software applications from apple store. In the second place, the unrewarding low price can damage customers’ physical health. Some products will directly contact people’s body or organs, such as toys and some medicines. If these goods are produced with unqualified raw materials, they will bring huge disasters to consumers, which actually cannot be measured by money.

To conclude based on the discussion above, the consequence of low price is determined by the causing factors of the low price. However, the government is required to eradicate those illegal low price suppliers, which will ensure the right of citizens.

l  社会准则

Society is based on rules and laws. It would not function if individuals are free to do whatever they want to.

To what extent do you agree or disagree? （A）

参考范文：

As the society develops constantly, the topic of following rules and laws tends to be increasingly popular, which sparks a heated debate among the public. Some people propose that citizens are required to follow the two stuffs mentioned above. As for me, I am strongly in favor of it based on some reasons.

The first and foremost factor is that it will ensure residents’ various rights. It is universally recognized that obeying laws is actually protecting citizens’ right from being offended by others. More specifically, under the social system, civilians are linked together, which means that it will offer an excuse for others to copy the illegal behavior if one ignores the requirement of laws. For instance, if we allow victims to kill the murder without limit, such irregular revenge will make our society full of danger. Therefore, obeying laws can promise the society functions in the expected order.

Another reason to support my view is that it can enhance the entire social efficiency. That is to say, every single citizen wants to achieve his goal in the shortest time and the fewest resources. Indeed, we should learn to compromise by submitting those customized regulations as well as laws so that individuals can accomplish their jobs and the society will not fall in chaos. Taking the traffic in some Asian countries as the best example, in the crossroad without traffic light, each vehicle wants to pass the road in a rush, which actually leads to the serious traffic jam. However， rules and laws allow people to carry out a variety of tasks based on a fixed sequence.

Even though rules and laws may somehow limit people’s behavior, the absolute freedom is virtually harmful to the society.

Based on what has presented above, it is safe enough to draw the conclusion that obeying rules and laws is a mandatory obligation for every citizen. Indeed, the government has to punish those offenders strictly so that it can ensure the high efficiency of the social operation.

l  科技与农业生产

Some people support the developments in agriculture such as factory farming and creations of new types of fruits and vegetables, while others oppose this view.

Discuss both views and give your opinion. （B）

As the society advances constantly, the application of science technology in agriculture fields tend to be increasingly common. People’s attitude towards such development varies greatly, with some people advocating while others against it. Before presenting my view, I intend to *yze this issue completely.

On the one hand, the agricultural technology is able to increase the efficiency. Firstly, those machines can improve the productivity greatly. Unlike human labours, the well-designed machines have the ability to finish multiple jobs at the same period, and their working range far surpasses that of human beings. If we use machines to carry out various agricultural production; we will gain more fruits and decrease the human labour. For instance, the combined-harvester can prepare the new seeds when it harvests the crops, which allows people to work in a larger square. In addition, agricultural technology can also shrink the producing period. The growth of crops mainly relied on the natural conditions, such as the sunshine and the rain fall, but people now can add some artificial factors to boost the growth of these crops. By placing the fertilizers, the crops can absorb more nutrition; by spraying the pesticides, the crops can be free from the pest disasters, which will decrease the time for their growth.

On the other hand, we cannot ignore the problems involved in the agricultural technology. The obvious one is the potential harm of the chemical remains on human beings. As mentioned above, people will use fertilizers and pesticides in many cases, which will consequently stay in the organs of the plants for a long time. When people intake such fruits and vegetables, the chemical stuffs will be digested or even absorbed by human beings. For example, the DDV for driving the pest is hard to be drained out of the plants, which is extremely harmful to people’s health.

Based on the discussion above, I personally reckon that the agricultural technology should be promoted. However, we should also spare no effort to decrease the potential risks brought by the technology.

l  环计划与个人

Some people believe that environmental problems are too big for individuals to deal with, while others think that individuals should take some action.

Discuss both views and give your opinion. （B）

参考范文：

In recent years, environmental protection increasingly arouses intense public concern, and who are supposed to assume the responsibility tends to be controversial. Some assert that it is beyond single persons' capability, while others claim that individuals do have the obligation to participate in environmental protection. Before presenting my perception, I intend to go through these two views completely.

Those who advocate the former opinion suggest that individuals have comparatively limited financial strength. Undeniably, conducting environmental activities do require an astonishing number of money; however, it is impossible for ordinary citizens to gather such money to preserve the environment. Even if they have a strong desire to devote themselves to ecological protecting, their efforts would probably make little contribution. In addition, preserving the environment demands advanced technology, which is also out of the citizens' approach. Specifically, each grave environmental issue such air pollution or rubbish processing cannot be thoroughly tackled by human labor, which means single people's attempt might be senseless to the improvement of the environment.

In contrast, others are convinced that individuals ought to be engaged in the process of environmental protection. If single persons are not involved, whatever the government and other organizations do will be fruitless. Indeed, the mass of people might unconsciously spoil various official gains when they are excluded from the campaigns. Furthermore, some activities can be achieved without financial or technology support. For instance, a single person's tiny endeavor such as reducing the consumption of non-biodegradable plastic bags or commuting via public transportation instead of private cars would radically change the ever deteriorating environment. That means individuals are virtually the main force to conserve the environment.

To sum up, based on the *ysis above, I strongly concur that individuals must take part in the process of environmental protection, otherwise it will be expensive but ineffective.