环球教育教你雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法

今天，阅读老师张萌为大推荐阅读了一篇关于 雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法 ，希望对正在备考雅思阅读配对题的烤鸭们有所帮助。愿意与你分享每一篇好文章！

人名观点配对一般考察的是某个人的言论,一般这个题的答案在文中就只有两个地方：

1. 雅思阅读人名观点配对做题之直接引语
2. 雅思阅读人名观点配对做题之宾语从句(* claim/believe/insist/point out/suggest/discover/find/conclude )

雅思阅读配对题的人名出现方式：
1. 全称(full name)John Barry
2. 名(first name)，不常见
3. 姓(surname)如：Professor Smith
4. He/she (在同一段话中，该人再次出现时，用指示代词替代)

雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法

因此，寻找找人名时，应该将上述四种情况均考虑进去。另外，如果一个人名在一段话中出现N次，也只能算一次。如果一个人名在N段话中出现，就算N次。
该题的答案遍布于全文。因此应该从文章的开头往后依次寻找人名。
该题其实考察的就是这些人所说的几句话，应先从文中找人名，再去找答案。

雅思阅读人名观点配对题举例

以剑桥4 P53 的人名观点配对题为例。该题共出现五个人：Robert Barton; Marc Bekoff; John Byers; Sergio Pellis; Stephen Siviy; 其中，Robert Barton; Sergio Pellis; Stephen Siviy仅出现一次。Marc Bekoff在文中出现两次;John Byers出现了三次。
这样，我们先解决出现一次的人名，然后去处理出现两次的人名，后处理出现三次的人名。
处理出现一次的人名
在这三个出现一次的人名中，Sergio Pellis是在文中个出现的人名，现在以此为例进行分析讲解。

教你雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法分析

Sergio Pellis 出现在E段的开头：Earlier this year, Sergio Pellis of Lethbridge University, Canada, reported that there is a strong positive link between brain size and playfulness among mammals in general. Comparing measurements for fifteen orders of mammal, he and his team found larger brains (for a given body size) are linked to greater playfulness. The converse was also found to be true.

我们将个句子进行简化：先将时间短语删去，将该人的单位删去。

Sergio Pellis reported that there is a strong positive link between brain size and playfulness among mammals in general(可删).

这里的positive link是指正相关，或成正比。Size表示尺寸大小，是指脑袋的大小和玩成正比。如果理解不透彻，可继续往下读两句。而后两句恰恰是对positive link的详细解释。

由此，回到选项中，进行对应，唯有：D. There is a tendency for mammals with *aller brains to play less. (*aller brains 与play less就是对称正比的诠释)。选项A. There is a link between a specific substance in the brain and playing. 是干扰项，因为这里的link between.... and ....之间的名词所指不同。

雅思阅读人名观点配对题举例

看剑桥5钢化玻璃这一篇
On 2nd August 199.9, a particularly hot day in the town of Cirencester in the UK, a large pane of toughened glass in the roof of a shopping centre at Bishops Walk shattered without warning and fell from its frame. When fragments were *ysed by experts at the giant glass manufacturer Pilkington, which had made the pane, they found that minute crystals of nickel sulphide trapped inside the glass had almost certainly caused the failure.

'The glass industry is aware of the issue,' says Brian Waldron, chairman of the standards committee at the Glass and Glazing Federation, a British trade association, and standards development officer at Pilkington. But he insists that cases are few and far between. 'It's a very rare phenomenon,' he says.

Others disagree. 'On average I see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures,' says Barrie Josie, a consultant engineer involved in the Bishops Walk investigation. Other experts tell of similar experiences. Tony Wilmott of London-based consulting engineers Sandberg, and Simon Armstrong at CIadTech Associates in Hampshire both say they know of hundreds of cases. 'What you hear is only the tip of the iceberg,' says Trevor Ford, a glass expert at Resolve Engineering in Bri*ane, Queensland. He believes the reason is simple: 'No-one wants bad press.'

Toughened glass is found everywhere, from cars and bus shelters to the windows, walls and roofs of thousands of buildings around the world. It's easy to see why. This glass has five times the strength of standard glass, and when it does break it shatters into tiny cubes rather than large, razor-sharp shards. Architects love it because large panels can be bolted together to make transparent walls, and turning it into ceilings and floors is almost as easy.

It is made by heating a sheet of ordinary glass to about 620°C to soften it slightly, allowing its structure to expand, and then cooling it rapidly with jets of cold air. This causes the outer layer of the pane to contract and solidify before the interior. When the interior finally solidifies and shrinks, it exerts a pull on the outer layer that leaves it in permanent compression and produces a tensile force inside the glass. As cracks propagate best in materials under tension, the compressive force on the surface must be overcome before the pane will break, making it more resistant to cracking.

The problem starts when glass contains nickel sulphide impurities. Trace amounts of nickel and sulphur are usually present in the raw materials used to make glass, and nickel can also be introduced by fragments of nickel alloys falling into the molten glass. As the glass is heated, these atoms react to form tiny crystals of nickel sulphide. Just a tenth of a gram of nickel in the furnace can create up to 50,000 crystals.

These crystals can exist in two forms: a dense form called the alpha phase, which is stable at high temperatures, and a less dense form called the beta phase, which is stable at room temperatures. The high temperatures used in the toughening process convert all the crystals to the dense, compact alpha form. But the subsequent cooling is so rapid that the crystals don't have time to change back to the beta phase. This leaves unstable alpha crystals in the glass, primed like a coiled spring, ready to revert to the beta phase without warning.

When this happens, the crystals expand by up to 4%. And if they are within the central, tensile region of the pane, the stresses this unleashes can shatter the whole sheet. The time that elapses before failure occurs is unpredictable. It could happen just months after manufacture, or decades later, although if the glass is heated - by sunlight, for example - the process is speeded up. Ironically, says Graham Dodd, of consulting engineers Arup in London, the oldest pane of toughened glass known to have failed due to nickel sulphide inclusions was in Pilkington's glass research building in Lathom, Lancashire. The pane was 27 years old.

Data showing the scale of the nickel sulphide problem is almost impossible to find. The picture is made more complicated by the fact that these crystals occur in batches. So even if, on average, there is only one inclusion in 7 tonnes of glass, if i you experience one nickel sulphide failure in your building, that probably means you've got a problem in more than one pane. Josie says that in the last decade he has worked on over 15 buildings with the number of failures into double figures.

One of the worst examples of this is Waterfront Place, which was completed in 1990. Over the following decade the 40 storey Bri*ane block suffered a rash of failures. Eighty panes of its toughened glass shattered due to inclusions before experts were finally called in. John Barry, an expert in nickel sulphide contamination at the University of Queensland, *ysed every glass pane in the building. Using a studio camera, a photographer went up in a cradle to take photos of every pane.
These were scanned under a modified microfiche reader for signs of niclrel sulphide crystals. 'We discovered at least another 120 panes with potentially dangerous inclusions which were then replaced,' says Barry. 'It was a very expensive and time-consuming process that took around six months to complete.' Though the project cost A$1.6 million (nearly £700,000), the alternative - re-cladding the entire building - would have cost ten times as much.

教你雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法分析

人名Brian Waldron在二段出现，人名前有一个直接引语'The glass industry is aware of the issue,'，而直接引语括号中是逗号，证明作者的观点没完，所以一定要再往后面找有没有宾语从句和直接引语，如果有宾语从句就会以代词he或者she出现，此人名Brian Waldron后面确实出现了宾语从句和直接引语，并且是出题点But he insists that cases are few and far between。Few对应的是G选项的rare。

二个考到的人名Trevor Ford在三段出现，此段有很多干扰人名，定位到Trevor Ford后，此题出题思路和题完全一样，也是直接引语括号中是逗号。

三个人名在倒数四段says Graham Dodd，此题says和人名倒装了，证明后面是宾语从句，且省去了引导词that，人名后的头衔of consulting engineers Arup in London, 一定要快速过掉，后面才是考点所在 the oldest pane of toughened glass known to have failed due to nickel sulphide inclusions was in Pilkington's glass research building in Lathom, Lancashire. The pane was 27 years old，宾语从句中的oldest对应的是delayed。

以上即是本次老师为大推荐阅读的教研文章 教你雅思阅读人名观点配对做题方法分析 。希望我们的每一份努力都能转化为每一位雅思考生分数的提高。在，这里有优秀的雅思考教研团队、报分计划、以及不同类型的针对性课程，旨在帮助到每一位备考雅思考的学员，能够顺利进入理想学府，圆满出国留学的梦想。所以想要得到专业的雅思考课程培训，请与我们的课程顾问联系做进一步的交流。后，预祝各位考顺利，前程光明！