雅思作文高分用词技巧分析 雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文高分用词技巧分析 雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

雅思作文高分用词技巧分析

雅思作文高分用词技巧介绍。雅思写作要想拿到高分，就要注意运用一些雅思写作高分用词技巧，那么这些技巧又是怎么样的呢?华丽的词汇，复杂的词汇还是什么?下面就来看看小编为大家收集整理的四大雅思作文高分用词技巧，分享给大家，希望对大家有所帮助，文中观点仅供参考。下面和小编一起来看看吧：

雅思作文高分用词技巧1. 使用同义词进行替换

使用同义词的好处在于首先可以向考官展示考生词汇量的丰富，其次也可以使文章富有变化。因此，同义词的运用是衡量雅思考生英语(论坛)水平的一个很有力的标准，考官认同你的同时，自然也会给你高分。请看下面的例子：

School teachers used to be the source of information. However，some people argue that teachers are not as important as before because there is an increasing variety of information resources. What is your opinion (08年4月24日考题)

雅思作文高分用词技巧2. 使用各种形式的同根词进行替换

英语里面有很多同根词，专家分析认为，通过单词的变换来吸引阅卷者眼球并获得高分是一个很好的办法。一些单词通过添加前缀或者后缀的方式可以衍生出很多新的词汇。而使用这些词汇可以避免重复原文当中的词条，也可以向阅卷者展示你变化词汇的技巧。

比如雅思写作中我们经常会用到“知道”这个概念，我们可以用know这个词以及它的其他形式和它们的同义词来表示“知道”这个意思。

雅思作文高分用词技巧3. 使用短语进行替换

雅思写作中同样可以拥有丰富的短语，使用它们，可以准确传达原文中的信息。在一些特殊情况下，短语也可以作为增加字数的方法。以下我们来看另外一个例子：

Some say that building more roads will help reduce the traffic congestion in big cities. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Do you support or oppose this statement

雅思作文高分用词技巧4. 综合使用各种方法进行替换

经过了上述几种方法的讨论，我们可以进行综合的运用，切勿只拘泥于一种方法。比如我们要表达利益和好处这个意思时，我们一般可以使用benefit这个词，我们也可以使用其他不同的形式来表达利益和好处这个意思。

用同义词对于原句进行替换后，再把原句的结构进行适当的变换，最终呈现在阅卷者面前的句子和原来就截然不同，但是意思基本一致的。又比如：英特网对我们的日常生活带来很大的影响。这句话我们可以写出不同的搭配。

以上就是雅思作文高分用词技巧的相关介绍。因此在雅思写作中，利用各种方法进行替换一些词还是非常必要的，而且还要切合意思，最后小编祝大家都能考出好成绩。

雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典

如果你真正明白IELTS academic writing的套路，这道题就是在太好写了。典型的折衷式写法-四段式，大负小正，小的方面放在前面写。具体说：

开头段+主体段1承认更严厉的惩罚是有效办法之一+主体段2提出还有其他的办法也必须要一起执行才可以+结尾段总结。Thesis statement 和 topic sentences 在范文里用下划线标明。理由用TM STREEC $体系解决，全程使用模板，22分钟在笔记本上完成创作。

高分关键词：car ownership汽车占有量 incidence 发生率 car wrecks 撞车 perpetrators 肇事者 stiff punishment/severe punishment/ harsh penalty 严厉的惩罚 halt/curb 遏制 rampant 猖獗的 apprehensive 形容词，对……有所顾忌的 surveillance camera 监控摄像头 promulgate 颁布（法令） hazard （危险） forestall=prevent 预防 pedestrian 行人

jaywalk 违章横穿马路 circumvent 规避 the law enforcement执法（部门） draconian（法律）严厉的 lax （法律）松懈的

The soaring car ownership in China has thrown the issue of traffic accidents into sharp relief. According to recent research conducted by China's Ministry of Transportation, the annual incidence of car wrecks is nearly three times as high as the corresponding figure a decade ago. Many people have been alarmed by this trend and assert that imposing stiffer punishment on the perpetrators is the only effective way to curb this disturbing phenomenon. Speaking for myself, I tend to believe their view has both merit and demerit.

Granted, more severe penalty does carry certain advantages in halting the rampant driving offenses on the roads.First and foremost ,it would be the most cost-effective way to deter those would-be driving offenders. Heavy fines, long community service or even jail terms would render most of the aggressive drivers apprehensive about violating the traffic law, even without extra government funding to upgrade traffic surveillance cameras or augment traffic police force. Further, the effect of this hardline approach would be immediate. Once the related law is promulgated, we would be sure to witness a substantial decline in driving offenses overnight.

However, there are also traffic hazards that we cannot forestall by merely stiffening the punishment of aggressive or destructive driving conduct. To begin with, pedestrians who habitually jaywalk will not be discouraged by this move. Pedestrians account for a considerable proportion of traffic-accident culprits. Thus, pedestrian offenses such as jaywalking must be effectively checked as well. Secondly, if people who are regularly behind the wheel are not awakened to the horrific perils traffic offenses may breed , some of them will exploit every possibility to circumvent the law enforcement capability. If people abide by the traffic law solely out of fear for punishment, when a surveillance camera is out of order or the traffic police fail to keep tabs on a specific section of a freeway, all hell would break loose. Lastly, strict punishment of disorderly driving conduct does not guarantee infallible detection of driving offenses. Without sophisticated traffic-offense detecting apparatuses and an alert traffic police force, traffic laws, no matter how draconian, would be lax enough for hardened reckless drivers to disregard.

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。