中国人写雅思作文的大忌：中式思维 美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了中国人写雅思作文的大忌：中式思维 美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

中国人写雅思作文的大忌：中式思维

一、词汇贫乏，用词单一，表达呆板

雅思考试要求考生的词汇量在8000个以上，而这其中有三分之一指的是阅读中的一些高难词汇或专业词汇，对于本站们写作而言，能够灵活高效地运用 5000词汇就已足够。很多考生中文功底扎实，思路敏捷，拿到雅思题目时也是有感而发，文思如泉涌，无奈囊中羞涩，词汇量有限，再多的想法和思路就如同茶壶里的饺子，有货却倒不出来，可谓是“只可意会，不可言传”。一篇250字的雅思作文让广大考生绞尽脑汁，搜肠刮肚，结果写出来的句子并没有准确高效地表达自己的意思。词汇量的贫乏就直接导致了考生在写作中用词单一，表达呆板，全文就是一些简单词汇的不断重复和累加，写作能力也可见一斑。有些考生一想起“ 产生，引起”，就习惯性用“produce”，却不了解 “promote, generate, trigger, lead to, result in”等词汇和短语的表达都有此意思，完全可以在写作当中进行词汇的替换。而简单词汇的重复不仅让文章在词汇上水平不高，通篇归于平庸，而且让一些能够成为行文闪光点的精辟思维和见解也黯然失色。

二、用词不当，词不达意，中式英语充斥全文

有些考生单词量不小，在行文中也能够做到词汇的同义转换，然而写出来的文章还是让考*夷所思，大跌眼镜，究其原因，主要是用词不够准确，chinglish大行其道，整篇文章就是考生想当然的一个汉译英过程，其结果也就可想而知。

许多考生在背词汇时，往往只是满足于知晓单词的中文意思，而不深究词汇的具体用法。英语的每个单词都有它的denotation(字面意思)和 connotation(内涵意思)，一些同义词在感*彩上可能大相径庭。并且，由于中西方文化和传统的差异，一些相同的意象可能负载着不同的文化内涵，而这些都是考生在写作中要注意的问题。

比如 说“slander, slim, lean, skinny, underweight, lanky”等词都有“瘦”的意思，而 “slander”是褒义的，“skinny”是贬义的，而“underweight”是中性的。再比方说, “dragon”(龙)这个意象，在中国人眼里是“吉祥，高贵”的象征，而在西方人的眼里却是“邪恶”的象征，从西方史诗Beowulf《贝尔沃夫》里那条邪恶的喷火龙Grendel就可见一斑。还有一些考生完全不顾及单词的用法和固定搭配，杜撰出的中式英语令人啼笑皆非，写作分数自然提不高。

美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析

题目：

Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of * life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

参考范文：

Some feel that the children of low income families are better equipped to deal with difficulties posed by the “real world” when they grow up and they also believe the privileged children of wealthy families are less fit to deal with these difficulties.The implications and veracity of this argument seem self-evident,but in fact require closer examination.

The popular wisdom is that children of poorer families learn early on the value of a buck ,and are thus naturally better suited to stretching money when times get tough in *hood. Inversely, the children of wealthy families,thoseborn with a silver spoon in their mouths,are believed to be completely ignorant of the tentimes erroneously expecting the same situation in *hood.They are believed to be prone to overspending and financial irresponsibility. This belief,though logical,overlooks one key point which is,of course,education.

The basis of this argument is,of course,knowing the value of money ,and the idea that children of the poor know this,and those of the wealthy do not.Who though,is in a better position to teach their children the value of money,someone skilled in earning and keeping it,the wealthy parent,or someone who can not seem to acquire it,the poor parent? Both wealthy and poor children are equally likely to acquire an education in money,whether it is formal,or in the school of hard knocks. Conversely, both children are as likely to ignore this education.

A poor child may believe that one can get along,if not as easily,without wealthy.A wealthy child may be well trained by a parent steeped in the knowledge of money management,the key to developing this skill is education.

本文摘自新东方张弛新博客

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。