雅思作文99%的学生都会犯的问题有哪些 雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文99%的学生都会犯的问题有哪些 雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

雅思作文99%的学生都会犯的问题有哪些

大部分同学在复习雅思小作文中会出现这样那样的问题，由于中国的传统教育中对于图表类描写的练习涉及少，同学们不能熟练掌握写作手法。常有同学面对小作文的图表无从下手。下面，雅思小编为大家列举在雅思小作文写作过程中，99%的学生都会犯的问题有哪些

一般没有had a decrease/ increase的说法，一般是saw a decrease/increase

Increased, decreased, declined 这些上升和下降的词都没有被动语态

当the number, the amount, the figure， the proportion做句子的主语的时候，不能用account for

The proportion of 后面不能加句子，譬如说 the proportion of people worked in the healthcare sector是错的，要写成the proportion of people who worked in the healthcare sector

The amount不能替换the number

Ratio和rate一般不能替代proportion和percentage

Picture 不能替换graph 或者chart

不要用定语从句读数据，譬如说 the crime rate in the US was highest, which was 0.3%. 这里的which was 直接省略。

结尾段一般不写in conclusion

结尾段不能写数据

一般是compared with，而不是comparing with

Followed by后面要写名词，而且这个名词要和主句的主语性质差不多

Reach 读数据的时候不能加to或者at, 直接加数据就可以

说人年龄的时候应该是aged，譬如说people aged from 15 to 24

一般不会用过去进行时态，也就是was increasing/decreasing 是错的

While, whereas一定要连接两个独立的句子，不能够单独存在

副词slightly不能修饰名词，应该是slight increase, drop

小作文一般用不到minimum这个词，minimal的意思不是“最小的”，而是“基本上可以忽略不计的”

尽量不要用套句，如果用，要注意不要写错，it is worth noting that, it should be noted that

图表作文一般用不到on the contrary, 用in contrast, by contrast即可

表示波动可以说fluctuated，不要写saw a fluctuation

Reduce和raise这两个词小作文用不到，因为是及物动词;arise也不能替代rise;“ascent/descent”不能用在小作文里。

remained 后面只能加形容词，也就是“remain constantly”是错的，只有“remain constant”

在动态图里，一般是rose “数字”-fold，譬如说是”rose fivefold”而不是“rose five times”

Doubled(增长一倍)不及物动词，没有被动

“outnumber”的主语一般是可数名词的复数，不能是不可数名词;表示超过的时候，一般是用overtake/surpass

“millions” 或者“thousands”在句子中出现时不能加复数，只有“数字+million or thousand”的说法

动态图过分注重数据和小的波动，而忽视趋势。所谓趋势，就是一个区间内最主要的一个变化(譬如说，如果大部分时候是上升，就是上升趋势)

静态图过分侧重读数据，没有将数据归类和归纳(具备类似特征的数据要放在一起)

图表作文最好不要出现in addition, moreover这些连接词

雅思作文范文：提高道路安全需用重典

如果你真正明白IELTS academic writing的套路，这道题就是在太好写了。典型的折衷式写法-四段式，大负小正，小的方面放在前面写。具体说：

开头段+主体段1承认更严厉的惩罚是有效办法之一+主体段2提出还有其他的办法也必须要一起执行才可以+结尾段总结。Thesis statement 和 topic sentences 在范文里用下划线标明。理由用TM STREEC $体系解决，全程使用模板，22分钟在笔记本上完成创作。

高分关键词：car ownership汽车占有量 incidence 发生率 car wrecks 撞车 perpetrators 肇事者 stiff punishment/severe punishment/ harsh penalty 严厉的惩罚 halt/curb 遏制 rampant 猖獗的 apprehensive 形容词，对……有所顾忌的 surveillance camera 监控摄像头 promulgate 颁布（法令） hazard （危险） forestall=prevent 预防 pedestrian 行人

jaywalk 违章横穿马路 circumvent 规避 the law enforcement执法（部门） draconian（法律）严厉的 lax （法律）松懈的

The soaring car ownership in China has thrown the issue of traffic accidents into sharp relief. According to recent research conducted by China's Ministry of Transportation, the annual incidence of car wrecks is nearly three times as high as the corresponding figure a decade ago. Many people have been alarmed by this trend and assert that imposing stiffer punishment on the perpetrators is the only effective way to curb this disturbing phenomenon. Speaking for myself, I tend to believe their view has both merit and demerit.

Granted, more severe penalty does carry certain advantages in halting the rampant driving offenses on the roads.First and foremost ,it would be the most cost-effective way to deter those would-be driving offenders. Heavy fines, long community service or even jail terms would render most of the aggressive drivers apprehensive about violating the traffic law, even without extra government funding to upgrade traffic surveillance cameras or augment traffic police force. Further, the effect of this hardline approach would be immediate. Once the related law is promulgated, we would be sure to witness a substantial decline in driving offenses overnight.

However, there are also traffic hazards that we cannot forestall by merely stiffening the punishment of aggressive or destructive driving conduct. To begin with, pedestrians who habitually jaywalk will not be discouraged by this move. Pedestrians account for a considerable proportion of traffic-accident culprits. Thus, pedestrian offenses such as jaywalking must be effectively checked as well. Secondly, if people who are regularly behind the wheel are not awakened to the horrific perils traffic offenses may breed , some of them will exploit every possibility to circumvent the law enforcement capability. If people abide by the traffic law solely out of fear for punishment, when a surveillance camera is out of order or the traffic police fail to keep tabs on a specific section of a freeway, all hell would break loose. Lastly, strict punishment of disorderly driving conduct does not guarantee infallible detection of driving offenses. Without sophisticated traffic-offense detecting apparatuses and an alert traffic police force, traffic laws, no matter how draconian, would be lax enough for hardened reckless drivers to disregard.

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。