雅思作文越复杂越好 美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析

雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文越复杂越好 美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。

雅思作文越复杂越好？中国学生常见的四大误区

1. 误解一：句子结构越复杂，得分越高

许多考生在考雅思写作的时候，拼了命的把准备的各种句型拐弯抹角地套在一起，窃以为考官在阅卷的时候必会为自己强大的语法功底所折服，进而给个六分。可是，雅思作文考试毕竟不是语法考试。一篇好雅思文章应该流畅自然，而不是生搬硬套，无中生有。这种费尽心机写下的“高分”句子往往会弄巧成拙，影响文章整体的自然性和流畅性。

2. 误解二：使用的单词越生僻，得分越高

有些考生在学到雅思写作要换词后，每次练习写作都不惜花大把时间把简洁的词汇Google成百年难得一遇的生僻词，然后死死记下，当作替换词用到考试中，以博考官注意，达到画龙点睛之效，然而结果却往往事与愿违。其实，单词不求复杂，要的是贴切。像是经济学人上的学术性文章上，也常会用到cut来描述价格、经费上的消减。这不但不会让人觉的低俗幼稚，反而能让人觉得干脆利落，毫不留情。而且，用复杂的单词极易拼写错，更让考官对之反感。同时，Google来的甚至是字典上的单词往往会翻译得不准确，一旦使用就会闹出笑话。例如褒词贬用，贬词褒用，让考官完全抓不准考生的观点和立场，影响得分。单词的恰当使用时一个学习积累的过程，如果没有足够的把握，务必慎用。

3. 误解三：写作文要加标题

英国考试有一个惯例，写作文时不需要加标题，直接写正文就行。加标题纯属画蛇添足，而且这个标题有时可能涵盖太大，整篇文章都不能很好的驾驭这个标题；有的时候又可能包含太少，一个标题只覆盖文中一两段的内容；有时甚至标题的意思与文章主题南辕北辙，各奔东西误导考官。所以写雅思作文时，切忌加标题。

4. 误解四：小作文每条数据都要描写

雅思官方有明确指出，大作文占的分量要比小作文大，而且考官在评分改卷时也以大作文为主。但有时考生在写作文时，把握不住时间，小作文写得过于详细，最后留给大作文的时间还不足半小时，这样就基本over了。而小作文写得久，就是因为很多考生都在千方百计地把图中出现的所有数据写入小作文中。最后，不但小作文的流畅自然被破坏，留给大作文的写作时间也所剩无几，进退维谷。其实，小作文的数据并不需要全数描写，这不单是为了节约时间给大作文，更是为了保障小作文的浑然天成，避免出现流水账的情况，以给小作文加分。

美国老师的雅思作文范文赏析

题目：

Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of * life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

参考范文：

Some feel that the children of low income families are better equipped to deal with difficulties posed by the “real world” when they grow up and they also believe the privileged children of wealthy families are less fit to deal with these difficulties.The implications and veracity of this argument seem self-evident,but in fact require closer examination.

The popular wisdom is that children of poorer families learn early on the value of a buck ,and are thus naturally better suited to stretching money when times get tough in *hood. Inversely, the children of wealthy families,thoseborn with a silver spoon in their mouths,are believed to be completely ignorant of the tentimes erroneously expecting the same situation in *hood.They are believed to be prone to overspending and financial irresponsibility. This belief,though logical,overlooks one key point which is,of course,education.

The basis of this argument is,of course,knowing the value of money ,and the idea that children of the poor know this,and those of the wealthy do not.Who though,is in a better position to teach their children the value of money,someone skilled in earning and keeping it,the wealthy parent,or someone who can not seem to acquire it,the poor parent? Both wealthy and poor children are equally likely to acquire an education in money,whether it is formal,or in the school of hard knocks. Conversely, both children are as likely to ignore this education.

A poor child may believe that one can get along,if not as easily,without wealthy.A wealthy child may be well trained by a parent steeped in the knowledge of money management,the key to developing this skill is education.

本文摘自新东方张弛新博客

以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://www.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。