剑桥雅思test5听力原文 关于雅思剑桥5听力的问题。 在test 3 section 1中！ 1。听力原文中的1.2litr

今天雅思无忧小编整理了剑桥雅思test5听力原文 关于雅思剑桥5听力的问题。 在test 3 section 1中！ 1。听力原文中的1.2litr相关信息，希望在这方面能够更好的大家。

本文目录一览：

• 1、关于雅思剑桥5听力的问题。 在test 3 section 1中！ 1。听力原文中的1.2litr
• 2、哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢
• 3、2023年5月11日雅思听力考试真题及答案

关于雅思剑桥5听力的问题。 在test 3 section 1中！ 1。听力原文中的1.2litr

1. 这本书有时候会出现书写错误，litre是体积的会加s, 2.大写问题一般是首字母大写，除非写文章标题可以全部大写，3. 两种格式一般是May 5th比较多，听力如果听不懂，建议参照听力原文，一句一句放，学着读出来，感受它是怎么发音的，慢一点，然后再收起听力原文去听

哪位有雅思剑5test1passage2的原文和答案？谢谢

Nature or Nurture?

A) A few years ago. in one of the most fascinating and disturbing experiments in behavioral psychology. Stanley Milgram of Yale University tested 40 subjects from all walks of life for their willingness to obey instructions given by a 'leader' in a situation in which the subjects might feel a personal distaste for the actions they were called upon to perform. Specifically, Milgram told each volunteer 'teacher-subject' that the experiment was in the noble cause of education, and was designed to test whether or not punishing pupils for their mistakes would have a positive effect on the pupils' ability to learn.

B) Milgram's experimental set-up involved placing the teacher-subject before a panel of thirty switches with labels ranging from '15 volts of electricity (slight shock)' to '450 volts (danger - severe shock)' in steps of 15 volts each. The teacher-subject was told that whenever the pupil gave the wrong answer to a question, a shock was to be administered, beginning at the lowest level and increasing in severity with each successive wrong answer. The supposed 'pupil' was in reality an actor hired by Milgram to simulate receiving the shocks by emitting a spectrum of groans, screams and writhing together with an assortment of statements and expletives denouncing both the experiment and the experimenter. Milgram told the teacher-subject to ignore the reactions of the pupil, and to administer whatever level of shock was called for. as per the rule governing the experimental situation of the moment.

C) As the experiment unfolded, the pupil would deliberately give the wrong answers to questions posed by the teacher, thereby bringing on various electrical punishments, even up to the danger level of 300 volts and beyond. Many of the teacher-subjects balked at administering The higher levels of punishment, and turned to Milgram with questioning looks and/or complaints about continuing the experiment. In these situations, Milgram calmly explained that the teacher-subject was to ignore the pupil's cries for mercy and carry on with the experiment. If the subject was still reluctant to proceed, Milgram said that it was important for the sake of the experiment that the procedure be followed through to the end His final argument was, 'You have no other choice. You must go on." What Milgram was trying to discover was the number of teacher-subjects who would be willing to administer the highest levels of shock, even in the face of strong personal and moral revulsion against the rules and conditions of the experiment.

D) Prior to carrying out the experiment, Milgram explained his idea to a group of 39 psychiatrists and asked them to predict the average percentage of people in an ordinary population who would be willing to administer the highest shock level of 450 volts. The overwhelming consensus was that virtually all the teacher-subjects would refuse to obey the experimenter. The psychiatrists felt that 'most subjects would not go beyond 150 volts' and they further anticipated that only four per cent would go up to 300 volts. Furthermore, they thought that only a lunatic fringe of about one in 1.000 would give the highest shock of 450 volts.

E) What were the actual results? Well, over 60 per cent of the teacher-subjects continued to obey Milgram up to the 450-volt limit! In repetitions of the experiment in other countries, the percentage of obedient teacher-subjects was even higher, reaching 85 per cent in one country. How can we possibly account for this vast discrepancy between what calm, rational, knowledgeable people predict in the comfort of their study and what pressured, flustered, but cooperative teachers' actually do in the laboratory of real life?

F) One's first inclination might be to argue that there must be some sort of built-in animal aggression instinct that was activated by the experiment, and that Milgram's teacher-subjects were just following a genetic need to discharge this pent-up primal urge onto the pupil by administering the electrical shock. A modern hard-core sociobiologist might even go so far as to claim that this aggressive instinct evolved as an advantageous trait, having been of survival value to our ancestors in their struggle against the hardships of life on the plains and in the caves, ultimately finding its way into our genetic make-up as a remnant of our ancient animal ways.

G) An alternative to this notion of genetic programming is to see the teacher-subjects' actions as a result of the social environment under which the experiment was carried out. As Milgram himself pointed out. Most subjects in the experiment see their behaviour in a larger context that is benevolent and useful to society - the pursuit of scientific truth. The psychological laboratory has a strong claim to legitimacy and evokes trust and confidence in those who perform there. An action such as shocking a victim, which in isolation appears evil, acquires a completely different meaning when placed in this setting."

H) Thus, in this explanation the subject merges his unique personality and personal and moral code with that of larger institutional structures, surrendering individual properties like loyalty, self-sacrifice and discipline to the service of malevolent systems of authority.

I) Here we have two radically different explanations for why so many teacher-subjects were willing to forgo their sense of personal responsibility for the sake of an institutional authority figure. The problem for biologists, psychologists and anthropologists is to sort out which of these two polar explanations is more plausible. This, in essence, is the problem of modern sociobiology - to discover the degree to which hard-wired genetic programming dictates, or at least strongly biases, the interaction of animals and humans with their environment, that is, their behaviour. Put another way, sociobiology is concerned with elucidating the biological basis of all behaviour.

答案：
14. F
15. A
16. B
17. D
18. I
19. C
20. B
21. D
22. C
23. Not Given
24. True
25. False
26. False

2023年5月11日雅思听力考试真题及答案

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
上周的雅思考试已经圆满结束，真题及答案也新鲜出炉。下面来跟着小钟老师看一看2023年5月11日雅思听力考试真题及答案。
场景话题：
S1电影俱乐部介绍/ S2澳洲新建度假中心/ S3广告/ S4人类模仿生物进行仿生设计
题型设置：
S1填空（新题）/ S2单选+多选（旧题）/ S3单选+配对（新题）/ S4填空（旧题）
12
解析：
本次考试场景为两新两旧，选择与填空题比例为20：20，难度适中。
填空题具体答案如下：（仅供参考）
s1rook；学生3. 22；4. 89460733；停车；历史；7.软件；传记恐怖10.青少年
S2les；12.有个别池塘；13.马牧场；14.？；15.适合所有年龄段；16.星期四和星期五；17.旅游商店；18.旅游预订处；19.认识艺术家；20.了解药物
s3e publications-B；ls-d；23.一般兴趣杂志-G；ites-A；mas-F；26.交易会 - G.
s4：31。狩猎；32.钢铁；头发；34.钓鱼；体育；痛苦；37.噪音；38.董事会；39.隧道；40.能量
点评：本场考试题型仍然比较常规化：单选，配对，多选，填空整场考试难度适中，场景为两旧两新，没有出现太难的生词拼写，不过细节方面还是需要注意，比如单复数形式，听力过程中一定要放平心态，集中注意力。其中S3难度偏大，语速偏快，整体反应配对部分偏难。建议学生在接下来的备考中，一定多提高听力基本功，提高语速，同时注意对配对题的针对性练习。
参考剑桥练习：剑10Test1S4，剑8Test4Section2，剑8Test3S4等
备注：在接下来的备考中，选择题（尤其是单选和配对）仍然是重中之重，同时加强多留意多选题的练习考生们可以选取剑桥真题的类似组合着重训练，记得多总结以及同义替换的积累。在练习听力的过程中，由于S3的难度有所提升，注意适当提高语速，平时练习时可加至1.25-1.5倍速练习。
考试预测
1.场景方面：场景方面依旧是主流场景（咨询，旅游，课程讨论，讲座），在接下来的考试中，考生还应将重点放在S1求职，租房，S2旅游，活动及公共场所设施介绍，S3课程讨论及论文写作，S4动植物，环境，历史，学术等各类学术讲座，同时下场考试应着重准备地图题等配对练习。
2.机经：如需参考机经，以2023 - 2023年机经为主。

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

以上就是雅思无忧小编给大家带来的剑桥雅思test5听力原文 关于雅思剑桥5听力的问题。 在test 3 section 1中！ 1。听力原文中的1.2litr全部内容，希望对大家有所帮助！

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。