剑桥雅思真题阅读正确多少题拿6.5？

今天雅思无忧小编整理了剑桥雅思真题阅读正确多少题拿6.5？相关信息，希望在这方面能够更好帮助到大家。

本文目录一览：

• 1、2020年1月4日雅思阅读考试真题答案
• 2、剑桥雅思真题阅读正确多少题拿6.5？
• 3、2020年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案

2020年1月4日雅思阅读考试真题答案

2020年的第一次雅思考试已经圆满结束了，真题和答案也已经新鲜出炉，大家考得怎么样呢？为大家准备了2020年1月4日雅思阅读考试真题答案。

考试概述

本场阅读考试3篇文章中匹配题考查较多，对考生的做题速度要求较高。

Passage 1

文章题材：说明文（生物科学）

文章题目：山雀

文章难度：★★★

文章内容：待补充

题型及数量：填空+判断

参考答案：待补充

可参考真题：剑桥12——TEST7 Passage1 Flying tortoises

Passage 2

文章题材：说明文（人文社科）

文章题目：讲故事的演进

文章难度：★★★

文章内容：待补充

题型及数量：填空+选择

参考答案：待补充

可参考真题：剑桥7——TEST3Passage2 Population Movements and Genetics

Passage 3

文章题材：说明文（人文社科）

文章题目：现代科技

文章难度：★★★

文章内容：待补充

题型及数量：匹配题+填空

参考答案：待补充

可参考真题：剑桥9——TEST3 Passage3 Information Theory – the big idea

话题词

科技发展类

1. tran*ission 传播

2. omit 忽略

3. incident 事件

4. distort 变形

5. overcome 克服

6. instrument 设备

7. statistics 统计学

8. pioneer 先驱

9. manage to do sth. 成功地做某事

10. prestigious 有名望的

同义替换词

1. follow/track/tail 跟随，跟踪

2. teach/educate/train/coach/instruct 教学

3. differ from/unusual/distinguish/recognize/identify 区别；与…不同

4. consult/ask somebody＇s advice咨询

5. explain/tell/show/demonstrate /throw/shed light on 解释

6. occur/happen/take place/turn up 发生

7. expand/get bigger/grow/swell up/stretch 扩张，扩大

8. emerge/appear/become visible/come into view/come into sight/come out 出现

9. generate/produce/manufacture 生产

10. predict/anticipate/forecast/foretell/expect 预测；预期

剑桥雅思真题阅读正确多少题拿6.5？

雅思阅读做对题目与分数情况介绍：

做对39-42题 9分/做对37-38题 8.5/做对35-36题 8/做对33-34题 7.5/做对31-32题 7/做对28-30题
6.5/做对25-27题 6

考生要找到方法来提高阅读的正确率。雅思阅读似乎天生就是用来刁难人的：近1000字的学术文章，不认识的单词，需要细细比对的题目……而这一切都要在二十分钟内完成。因此，很多雅思考生抱怨雅思阅读完成时间不够，或者匆匆忙忙做完了正确率太低。实际上，雅思阅读虽然文章长，题目多，但是在二十分钟内做完并且有一个可观的正确率，是完全可以达到的标准。

雅思阅读的时间不够主要源于两个方面：一是文章太长，二是题目涉及的信息点位置分散。对于第一个问题，需要在平时的备考过程中加强训练。这里面主要有两个问题，一是阅读速度慢，二是生单词阻碍了阅读的进度。阅读速度慢的问题只有通过大量阅读来解决。实际上，如果每天给自己一个规定的时间，在这一时间内要求自己必须完成一定字数的阅读，这样天天练习，阅读速度慢慢就会提高。很多时候，阅读的速度不够快和大脑接受英语信息的速度有关系，当大脑需要将英语翻译成汉语才能接受的时候，速度自然就慢了。因此，就需要平时养成英语的思维习惯，比较可行的办法是自己在心里对着自己说话，碰到任何一件有意思的事情，就在心里默默地用英语描述。除此以外，也可以找一份与雅思阅读难度相当的英语材料，每天大声快速的朗读，以此来训练自己快速接受英语信息的能力。应对生单词，则要有两手准备：一是平时阅读的时候多积累单词、看见不认识的单词，当时就记录下来并且反复复习;二是在考试中如果遇到了生词，不要慌张，一般而言都不影响理解，将它当作一个认识的单词就好，或者直接跳过去也未尝不可。但是有时会有关键词不认识的情况，所以，解决这个问题根本还是在平日的积累。

关于题目涉及信息分散的问题，主要通过做题技巧来弥补。通过浏览文章之后，我们在心里应该对文章什么部分讲什么有了一个大概的印象。这种“印象”是做题速度的根本保证。在这个基础上，要掌握一些基本的技巧。首先，雅思的阅读题的顺序通常是与文章相对应的，就是说，前面的题目对应文章的前几段，后面的题目对应文章的后几段，有一定的对应关系，这样，在寻找信息的时候就更能有的放矢，不至于满篇乱找。其次，雅思的阅读题中，比较容易出问题的可能是判断题和段落信息匹配题。判断题要坚持一个基本原则，那就是文章中没有提到的坚决是NOT
GIVEN。中国人的思维习惯，认为有所提及，但是没有说到，应该判断为错(FALSE或者NO)，但是，在雅思考试当中，就算文章所说内容与题目有关，但没有出现关键词，也不能认为对。例如2021年9月11日雅思A类考试第三篇文章，判断题中说行星上面可能有水，原文说的是行星被氢气层所环绕。看起来二者相关，但是答案应该是NOT
GIVEN，因为并没有提到跟水有关的东西，而题目所陈述的是跟水相关的情况。至于段落信息匹配题，就一定要找出关键词，并和原文进行比对。对于相似的信息，就需要在信息之间首先加以比较，找出分歧的地方，再到文章中去找。这样，就能很容易地找出信息所在段落了。

2020年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案

8月1号进行了八月初的第一场雅思的考试，相信大家对真题以及答案会非常的感兴趣、今天就由的我为大家介绍2020年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案。

一、考题解析

P1 土地沙漠化

P2 澳大利亚的鹦鹉

P3 多重任务

二、名师点评

1.8月份首场考试的难度总体中等，有出现比较多的配对题，没有出现Heading题，其余主要以常规的填空，判断和选择题为主。文章的话题和题型搭配也是在剑桥真题中都有迹可循，所以备考重心依然还是剑桥官方真题。

2. 整体分析：涉及环境类（P1）、动物类（P2）、社科类（P3）。

本次考试的P2和P3均为旧题。P2是动物类的话题，题型组合为：段落细节配对+单选+summary填空，难度中等。题型上也延续19年的出题特点，出现配对题，考察定位速度和准确度。P3也出现了段落细节配对，主要是段落细节配对+单选+判断。三种题型难度中等，但是文章理解起来略有难度。

3. 部分答案及参考文章：

Passage 1：土地沙漠化

题型及答案待确认

Passage 2：澳大利亚的鹦鹉

题型：段落细节配对+单选+Summary填空

技巧分析：由于段落细节配对是完全乱序出题，在定位时需要先做后面的单选题及填空题，最大化利用已读信息来确定答案，尽量避免重复阅读，以保证充分的做题时间。

文章内容及题目参考：

A 概况，关于一个大的生物种类

B 一些物种消失的原因，题干关键词：an example of one bird species extinct

C 一种鹦鹉不能自己存活，以捕食另一种鸟为生，吃该鸟类的蛋。题干关键词：two species competed at the expense of oneanother

D 吸引鹦鹉的原因以及鹦鹉嘴的特点。题干关键词：*ysis of reasons as Australian landscapeattract parrots

E 植物是如何适应鹦鹉。题干关键词：plants attract birds which make the animal adaptto the environment

F 南半球对英语的影响

G 两种鹦鹉从环境改变中获益并存活下来。题干关键词：two species of parrots benefit fromm theenvironment change

H 外来物种及本地鹦鹉

I 鸟类栖息地被破坏以及人类采取的措施

J 作者对于鹦鹉问题的态度

单选题：

why parrots in the whole world are lineal descendants of

选项关键词：continent split from Africa

the writer thinks parrots species beak is for

选项关键词：adjust to their suitable diet

which one is not mentioned

选项关键词：should be frequently maintained

填空题：分布在文章的前两段

one-sixth

16th century

mapmaker

John Gould

Passage 3：多重任务

题型：段落细节配对+单选+判断

参考答案及文章

28 F

29I

30C

31B

32G

33C

34B

35A

36YES

37YES

38NO

39NOT GIVEN

40NO

Passage3： multitasking

Multitasking Debate—Can you do them at the same time？

Talking on the phone while driving isn＇t the only situationwhere we＇re worse at multitasking than we might like to think we are. Newstudies have identified a bottleneck in our brains that some say means we arefundamentally incapable of true multitasking. If experimental findings reflectreal-world performance， people who think they are multitasking are probablyjust underperforming in all-or at best， all but one -of their parallelpursuits. Practice might improve your performance， but you will never be asgood as when focusing on one task at a time.

The problem， according to René Marois， a psychologist atVanderbilt University in Nashville， Tennessee， is that there＇s a sticking pointin the brain. To demonstrate this， Marois devised an experiment to locate nteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears， a red circle，say， they have to press a key with their index finger. Different colouredcircles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second， and thevolunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen todifferent recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance， whenthey hear a bird chirp， they have to say ＂ba＂； an electronic soundshould elicit a ＂ko＂， and so on. Again， no problem. A normal personcan do that in about half a second， with almost no effort. The trouble comeswhen Marois shows the volunteers an image， then almost immediately plays them asound. Now they＇re flummoxed. ＂If you show an image and play a sound atthe same time， one task is postponed，＂ he says. In fact，if the second taskis introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to thefirst， it will simply be delayed until the first one is done. The largestdual-task delays occur when the two tasks are presented simultaneously； delaysprogressively shorten as the interval between presenting the tasks lengthens（See Diagram）.

There are at least three points where we seem to getstuck， says Marois. The first is in simply identifying what we＇re looking  can take a few tenths of a second， during which time we are not able tosee and recognise a second item. This limitation is known as the＂attentional blink＂： experiments have shown that if you＇re watchingout for a particular event and a second one shows up unexpectedly any timewithin this crucial window of concentration， it may register in your visualcortex but you will be unable to act upon it. Interestingly， if you don＇texpect the first event， you have no trouble responding to the second. Whatexactly causes the attentional blink is still a matter for debate.

A second limitation is in our short-term visual ＇s estimated that we can keep track of about four items at a time， fewer ifthey are complex. This capacity shortage is thought to explain， in part， our astonishinginability to detect even huge changes in scenes that are otherwise identical，so-called ＂change blindness＂. Show people pairs of near-identicalphotos -say， aircraft engines in one picture have disappeared in the other -andthey will fail to spot the differences （if you don＇t believe it， check out theclips at /~rensink/flicker/download）. Here again， though， thereis disagreement about what the essential limiting factor really is. Does itcome down to a dearth of storage capacity， or is it about how much attention aviewer is paying？

A third limitation is that choosing a response to astimulus -braking when you see a child in the road， for instance，or replyingwhen your mother tells you over the phone that she＇s thinking of leaving yourdad -also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things willdelay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This iscalled the ＂response selection bottleneck＂ theory， first proposed in1952.

Last December， Marois and his colleagues published apaper arguing that this bottleneck is in fact created in two different areas ofthe brain： one in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex and another in thesuperior medial frontal cortex （Neuron， vol 52， p 1109）. They found this byscanning people＇s brains with functional MRI while the subjects struggled tochoose among eight possible responses to each of two closely timed tasks. Theydiscovered that these brain areas are not tied to any particular sense but aregenerally involved in selecting responses， and they seemed to queue theseresponses when presented with multiple tasks concurrently.

Bottleneck？ What bottleneck？

But David Meyer， a psychologist at the University ofMichigan， Ann Arbor， doesn＇t buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-taskinterference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritisemultiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his  has written papers with titles like ＂Virtually perfect time-sharing indual-task performance： Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck＂（Psychological Science， vol 12， p101）. His experiments have shown that withenough practice -at least 2000 tries -some people can execute two taskssimultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the  suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates allthis and， what＇s more， he thinks it uses discretion： sometimes it chooses todelay one task while completing another.

Even with practice， not all people manage to achieve thisharmonious time-share， however. Meyer argues that individual differences comedown to variations in the character of the processor -some brains are just more＂cautious＂， some more ＂daring＂. And despite urban legend，there are no noticeable

differences between men and women. So， according to him，it＇s not a central bottleneck that causes dual-task interference， but rather＂adaptive executive control＂， which ＂schedules task processesappropriately to obey instructions about their relative priorities and serialorder＂.

Marois agrees that practice can sometimes eraseinterference effects. He has found that with just 1 hour of practice each dayfor two weeks， volunteers show a huge improvement at managing both his tasks atonce. Where he disagrees with Meyer is in what the brain is doing to achievethis. Marois speculates that practice might give us the chance to find lesscongested circuits to execute a task -rather like finding trusty back streetsto avoid heavy traffic on main roads -effectively making our response to thetask subconscious. After all， there are plenty of examples of subconsciou*ultitasking that most of us routinely manage： walking and talking， eating andreading， watching TV and folding the laundry.

But while some dual tasks benefit from practice， otherssimply do not. ＂Certain kinds of tasks are really hard to do two atonce，＂ says Pierre Jolicoeur at the University of Montreal， Canada， whoalso studies multitasking. Dual tasks involving a visual stimulus andskeletal-motor response （which he dubs ＂in the eye and out the hand＂）and an auditory stimulus with a verbal response （＂in the ear and out themouth＂） do seem to be amenable to practice， he says. Jolicoeur has foundthat with enough training such tasks can be performed as well together asapart. He speculates that the brain connections that they use may be somehowspecial， because we learn to speak by hearing and learn to move by looking. Butpair visual input with a verbal response， or sound to motor， and there＇s nodramatic improvement. ＂It looks like no amount of practice will allow youto combine these，＂ he says.

For research purposes， these experiments have to be keptsimple. Real-world multitasking poses much greater challenges. Even the upbeatMeyer is sceptical about how a lot of us live our lives. Instant-messaging andtrying to do your homework？ ＂It can＇t be done，＂ he says. Conducting ajob interview while answering emails？ ＂There＇s no way you wind up being asgood.＂ Needless to say， there appear to be no researchers in the area ofmultitasking who believe that you can safely drive a car and carry on a phoneconversation. In fact， last year David Strayer at the University of Utah inSalt Lake City reported that people using cellphones drive no better thandrunks （Human Factors， vol 48， p 381）. In another study， Strayer found thatusing a hands-free kit did not improve a driver＇s response time. He concludedthat what distracts a driver so badly is the very act of talking to someone whoisn＇t present in the car and therefore is unaware of the hazards facing thedriver.

“No researchers believe it＇s safe to drive a car andcarry on a phone conversation”

It probably comes as no surprise that， generallyspeaking， we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer atthe University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign， who studies how ageing affectsour cognitive abilities， we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow throughour 30s and on into our 50s， it is there； and after 55， it becomes moreprecipitous. In one study， he and his colleagues had both young and oldparticipants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. Hefound that while young drivers tended to miss background changes， older driversfailed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise， older subjects hadmore trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than youngdrivers.

It＇s not all bad news for over-55s， though. Kramer alsofound that older people can benefit from practice. Not only did they learn toperform better， brain scans showed that underlying that improvement was achange in the way their brains become active.

Whileit＇s clear that practice can often make a difference， especially as we age， thebasic facts remain sobering. ＂We have this impression of an almightycomplex brain，＂ says Marois， ＂and yet we have very humbling andcrippling limits.＂ For most of our history， we probably never needed to domore than one thing at a time， he says， and so we haven＇t evolved to be ableto. Perhaps we will in future， though. We might yet look back one day on peoplelike Debbie and Alun as ancestors of a new breed of true multitaskers.

以上，就是雅思无忧小编给大家带来的剑桥雅思真题阅读正确多少题拿6.5？全部内容，希望对大家有所帮助！

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。