剑桥雅思阅读6 test3答案？ 2023年6月30日雅思阅读真题整理 雅思《剑6》 test3 阅读38到40题有问题

2023年6月30日雅思阅读真题整理

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
对于2023年6月30日的雅思考试，不知道同学们对于此次考试有哪些把握呢？接下来就和小钟老师来看看2023年6月30日雅思阅读真题整理。

权威点评
文章题材常规，涉及到环境，动物，商业类。据烤鸭们反馈，passage 3生词较多，导致原文和题干理解困难，影响做题。这要求考生在平时练习中多总结不同场景的高频词汇，并且提高在语境中理解生词的能力。从题型看，难度适中，基础题型：填空题(包括summary)和判断题占30个左右，考查对于细节信息的定位和理解;匹配题考查了6个段落信息匹配题，考查学生在短时间内准确找到匹配段落信息的能力，考生必须掌握高效做匹配题的方法，在有限的时间内拿到更多的分数。
Passage 1
题目Why good ideas fail?
话题分类商业类
题型及对应数量判断题 5
填空题 8
内容回忆一位市场营销专业的学生做了关于公司治理的案例，该公司早前获得了成功，后来失败了。两位专家对该公司的营销进行分析与评价，并且提出了一些市场营销的策略
题目回忆判断题
1 TRUE
2 TRUE
3 NOT GIVEN
4 NOT GIVEN
5 FALSE
填空题
6 surface
7 name
8 需要补充
9 weight loss
10 behavior
11 focus group
12 simple survey
13 instincts
参考阅读 10-3-1 商业类
Passage 2
题目Hold back floods
话题分类环境类
题型及数量段落信息匹配 6
单选题 2
填空题 5
内容回忆本文讲述了主要讲了洪水以前和现在的情况对比，以及治理洪水的新方法
Hold back flood
A Last winter’s floods on the rivers of central Europe were among the worst since the Middle Ages, and as winter storms return, the spectre of floods is returning too. Just weeks ago, the river Rhône in south-east France burst its banks, driving 15,000 people from their homes, and worse could be on the way. Traditionally, river engineers have gone for Plan A: get rid of the water fast, draining it off the land and down to the sea in tall-sided rivers re-engineered as high-performance drains. But however big they dug city drains, however wide and straight they made the rivers, and however high they build the banks, the floods kept coming back to taunt them, from the Mississippi to the Danube. And when the floods came, they seemed to be worse than ever. No wonder engineers are turning to Plan B: sap the water’s destructive strength by dispersing it into fields, forgotten lakes, flood plains and aquifers.
B Back in the days when rivers took a more tortuous path to the sea, flood waters lost impetus and volume while meandering across flood plains and idling through wetlands and inland deltas. But today the water tends to have an unimpeded journey to the sea. And this means that when it rains in the uplands, the water comes down all at once. Worse, whenever we close off more flood plains, the river’s flow farther downstream becomes more violent and uncontrollable. Dykes are only as good as their weakest link—and the water will unerringly find it. By trying to turn the complex hydrology of rivers into the simple mechanics of a water pipe, engineers have often created danger where they promised safety, and intensified the floods they meant to end. Take the Rhine, Europe’s most engineered river. For two centuries, German engineers have erased its backwaters and cut it off from its flood plain.
C Today, the river has lost 7 percent of its original length and runs up to a third faster. When it rains hard in the Alps, the peak flows from several tributaries coincide in the main river, where once they arrived separately. And with four-fifths of the lower Rhine’s flood plain barricaded off, the waters rise ever higher. The result is more frequent flooding that does ever-greater damage to the homes, offices and roads that sit on the flood plain. Much the same has happened in the US on the mighty Mississippi, which drains the world’s second largest river catchment into the Gulf of Mexico.
D The European Union is trying to improve rain forecasts and more accurately model how intense rains swell rivers. That may help cities prepare, but it won’t stop the floods. To do that, say hydrologists, you need a new approach to engineering not just rivers, but the whole landscape. The UK’s Environment Agency—which has been granted an extra £150 million a year to spend in the wake of floods in 2000 that cost the country £1billion—puts it like this: “The focus is now on working with the forces of nature. Towering concrete walls are out, and new wetlands are in.” to help keep London’s feet dry, the agency is breaking the Thames’s banks upstream and reflooding 10 square kilometres of ancient flood plain at Otmoor outside Oxford. Nearer to London it has spent £100 million creating new wetlands and a relief channel across 16 kilometres of flood plain to protect the town of Maidenhead, as well as the ancient playing fields of Eton college. And near the south coast, the agency is digging out channels to reconnect old meanders on the river Cuckmere in East Sussex that were cut off by flood banks 150 years ago.
E The same is taking place on a much grander scale in Austria, in one of Europe’s largest river restorations to date. Engineers are regenerating flood plains along 60 kilometres of the river Drava as it exits the Alps. They are also widening the river bed and channeling it back into abandoned meanders, oxbow lakes and backwaters overhung with willows. The engineers calculate that the restored flood plain can now store up to 10 million cubic metres of flood waters and slow storm surges coming out of the Alps by more than an hour, protecting towns as far downstream as Slovenia and Croatia.
F "Rivers have to be allowed to take more space. They have to be turned from flood-chutes into flood-foilers", says Nienhuis. And the Dutch. for whom preventing floods is a matter of survival. Have gone furthest. A nation built largely on drained marshes and seabed had the fright of its life in 1993 when the Rhine almost overwhelmed it. The same happened again in 1995. when a quarter of a million people were evacuated from the Netherlands. But a new breed of "soil engineers" wants our cities to become porous, and Berlin is their shining example. Since reunification, the city's massive redevelopment has been governed by tough new rules to prevent its drains becoming overloaded after heavy rains. Harald Kraft, an architect working in the city. says: "We now see rainwater as a resource to be kept rather than got rid of at great cost." A good illustration is the giant Potsdamer Platz, a huge new commercial redevelopment by Daimler Chrysler in the heart of the city.
G Los Angeles has spent billions of dollars digging huge drains and concreting river beds to carry away the water from occasional intense storms. The latest plan is to spend a cool 280millionraisingtheconcretewallsontheLosAngelesriverbyanother2metres.Yetmanycommunitiesstillfloodregularly.MeanwhilethisdesertcityisshippinginwaterfromhundredsofkilometresawayinnorthernCaliforniaandfromtheColoradoriverinArizonatofillitstapsandswimmingpools,andirrigateitsgreenspaces.Itallsoundslikebadplanning."InLAwereceivehalfthewaterweneedinrainfall,andwethrowitaway.Thenwespendhundredsofmillionstoimportwater,"saysAndyLipkis,anLAenvironmentalist,alongwithcitizengroupslikeFriendsoftheLosAngelesRiverandUnpavedLA.wanttobeattheurbanfloodhazardandfillthetap*yholdingontothecity′sfloodwater.Andit′snotjustapipedream.Theauthoritiesthisyearlauncheda280millionraisingtheconcretewallsontheLosAngelesriverbyanother2metres.Yetmanycommunitiesstillfloodregularly.MeanwhilethisdesertcityisshippinginwaterfromhundredsofkilometresawayinnorthernCaliforniaandfromtheColoradoriverinArizonatofillitstapsandswimmingpools,andirrigateitsgreenspaces.Itallsoundslikebadplanning."InLAwereceivehalfthewaterweneedinrainfall,andwethrowitaway.Thenwespendhundredsofmillionstoimportwater,"saysAndyLipkis,anLAenvironmentalist,alongwithcitizengroupslikeFriendsoftheLosAngelesRiverandUnpavedLA.wanttobeattheurbanfloodhazardandfillthetap*yholdingontothecity′sfloodwater.Andit′snotjustapipedream.Theauthoritiesthisyearlauncheda100 million scheme to road-test the porous city in one flood-hit community in Sun Valley. The plan is to catch the rain that falls on thousands of driveways, parking lots and rooftops in the valley. Trees will soak up water from parking lots. Homes and public buildings will capture roof water to irrigate gardens and parks. And road drains will empty into old gravel pits and other leaky places that should recharge the city's underground water reserves. Result: less flooding and more water for the city. Plan B says every city should be porous, every river should have room to flood naturally and every coastline should be left to build its own defenses. It sounds expensive and utopian, until you realize how much we spend trying to drain cities and protect our watery margins—and how bad we are at it.
题目回忆段落信息匹配题
1. A new approach conducted in the UK D
2. Reasons why twisty path and dykes failed B
3. One project on a river benefits three countries E
4. Illustration of an alternative plan in LA which seems unrealistic G
5. Efforts made in Netherlands and Germany F
6. Traditional ways of controlling flood A
选择题
7. A It may stop the flood involving the whole area
8. D reserve water to protect downstream towns
填空题
9. Berlin set a good example for others.
10. The Rhine and the Mississippi river had the similar problem of water control.
11. An area near Oxford was flooded to protect the city of London.
12. Such planners who want our cities to become porous are called soil engineers.
13. In Los Angeles, *all scale water project could become a larger one.
参考阅读532(环境类)
Passage 3
题目Australian Megafauna
话题分类生物类
题型及数量判断题 4
summary 5
选择题 5
内容回忆对澳大利亚大型动物megafauna的研究，分析人类在几千年前人是否与大型动物共存。有研究者质疑证据不足
题目回忆判断题
27 YES
28 NOT GIVEN
29 NO
30 YES
SUMMARY 题
31 B
32 H
33 D
34 C
35 G
选择题
36 A
37 B
38 A
39 C
40 D

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

雅思《剑6》 test3 阅读38到40题有问题

严格地说，全错Lz

没有什么 “虽然和答案不一样，但是我觉得我这样也是对的啊”这样的说辞

不客气地说一句 这种心态是一种 侥幸的心态，觉得自己写的和书里给的答案沾上边了，意思都一样，只不过部分单词不同

没错，你现在可以这么和我们说，可是你考试的时候跟谁说去，考官才不管你想表达的意思是一样的，对就是对，错就是错，只要你写的和参考答案上所给的所有答案都不一样，你的答案就是错的

IELTS阅读题是客观题，all keys are from the passage,所以不存在模棱两可的情况 我最后强调一遍 你必须要改掉这种侥幸心理，严格按照答案上给的形式来，到时候考试才不会因为拼写和格式这些低级错误犯错而扣冤枉分！

ok，说完心态，下面具体anylyse这三道题

原则性的东西先交代下 原则一： 这种题目 最好只能 减词（ 冠词 --介词--修饰词） 其他的一概不要变动

38 先定位到答案是 the amount of glucose
no more than three words: amount of glucose
no more than two words: amount glucose ，发现说不通，继续减，变成答案glucose

不要把 amount提到后面去 因为已经有介词of了 amount of 是一个整体 要省一起省，要留一起留，题目规定是no more than two words，所以只能省略

39 首先看到原文两句话是
One possibility relates to the ATP-making machinery's emission of the free radicals,which are thought……age-related diseases as cancer by damaging cells.Reduced operation of the machinery should limit their……

正确的做题 是定位到第一句话，第二句话是干扰项，根本就是个坑等着你跳的，然后你就毫不犹豫的跳下去了……

看题干 cells less damaged by disease because fewer_____ are emitted

题干里cells less damaged 对应原文 by damaging cells
disease 对应原文 such age-related diseases as cancer
emitted(发出光 射线) 对应原文 emission of free radicals

综上所述 题干就是第一句话的同意转化 只不过原文是which引导的一个 被动语态 的从句 题干则是主动态 说的都是一个意思
那么答案还找不到么？肯定是第一句的 free radicals

你的答案现在知道荒唐的地方了吧？你根本就是定位错了地方，找到第二句去了……第二句正好有 什么 operation of the machinery 后面也有一个damage来干扰你 但是你读读整句话，是题干的同意转化么？你句子都找错了地方，还敢说“虽然和答案不一样，但是我觉得我这样也是对的啊。”

现在觉得你的振振有词 有点底气不足了吧？
再看第三题 彻底让你印象深刻，记住阅读的心态和方法！

40 先看原文 emphasizes preservation of the organi*……
再看题干cells focus on___because……

emphasizes与focus on明显同意转化， 原文里emphasizes后紧跟的是 preservation of the organi*

以后的分析同38

关于补充，这没有普遍的规律，最主要还是看题目要求 只能 具体问题具体分析 但有个原则你记住是没错的 ：言多必失，像这种no more than……的 回答三个字不如回答两个字，回答两个字不如回答最核心的名词 如果你不是百分百肯定，写最简单的核心名词是最保险的。

ok，题目说完了 最后说几句题外话，
孩子，IELTS是有难度的，你当随便大街上拉个人去考IELTS都能 先迅速定位 再梳理 主谓宾 最后分析出这些语法 确定是同意转化么？

只有不断地练习 才能在实战里总结出IELTS的技巧和规律
就像我说的这些原则，有些是培训班老师说过，有些没人跟我说过，是我 剑桥 系列做过N遍后自己总结出来的，并且屡试不爽。
所以 要想在阅读上不犯错误，如鱼得水，每道题都能分析的头头是道，事先你要付出的努力是平常人数倍的辛苦和汗水。究竟怎么权衡，还是要自己多想想

关于LZ补充的补充……

首先很高兴你能说我的回答是中肯的 我就怕有人看我语气强烈点批评多点 就不高兴了 但实际上我说的都是实情，使用棒喝有助于你们尽快警醒自身的问题

其次 不要用 您 来称呼我 我表示鸭梨很大 我才21

最后 回答剑7-test2-14
听力原文是 ……you can visit the fine 16th century palace here built for the king with its beautiful formal gardens

答案给的是 （formal）garden

修饰词+核心名词 其中formal 是修饰词，可以省略，关于这个gardens，我确实纠结了一下，录音和scripts给的都是加了s的，答案没有s，我只能猜测这是印刷错误:答案少印了s,或者忘在s上面打上括号

当然，这也可以算我的狡辩吧，如果这里面真有什么很特殊的含义，我也相信这只是小小的例外，绝大部分情况的答案是完美的印证了我所说的原则，并且我说的按照答案来规范书写格式，我继续 保留意见 ，我相信照着做比天马行空的按自己想的来，要保险的多

英国人是保守而刻板的， IELTS考试 也是一样

以上就是雅思无忧小编为大家带来的内容了，想要了解更多相关信息，请关注雅思无忧。

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。