小编今天整理了一些雅思口语法律类话题如何作答相关内容,希望能够帮到大家。
本文目录一览:

雅思口语法律类话题如何作答
很多雅思考试学生本身对法律不熟,能用中文去解释一项法律都做不到,更不用说用英文来描述了。毕竟中国现代法律的发展和健全比西方晚了很多,所以很多考生对法律的陌生是可以理解的。但是这种想法限制了我们的思维,使考生们先入为主地认为自己不可能回答好这一个话题,这种想法在口语回答过程中是不可取的。毕竟每个人无法对所有的话题都有深入的了解,但这并不意味着遇到生僻抽象的话题就会得低分。接下来,就从多方面为大家讲解,可供参考。每个人的情况不同,也可以登录文都国际教育官网进行*的咨询。
一、如何理解题目
提到法律,很多考生第一感觉是类似于宪法、劳动法、刑法等很庄严、涵盖范围很广的法律。如果按这种思路来准备这个话题的话,确实会受自己有限知识量以及专业词汇不足的限制。
其实law到底是什么,韦氏高阶英语词典的解释是:
1、A. The whole system or set of rules made by the government of a town, state, country, etc.
B. A particular kind of law.
2、A rule made by the government of a town, state, country, etc.
从以上定义可以看出,a
law可以是一系列的或者单项的法律或法则,可以是国家、州、城市制定的.所以考生们可参考的范围就扩大了,既可以是宪法这样的大法,也可以是合同法、移民法、专利法等相对比较单项的法,更可以是当地*制定的某些政策法规,例如独生子女政策、房屋限购政策、限制环境污染政策等.
以下的法律名称可以供大家选择和参考:
New Labor law 新劳动法
Traffic Laws 交通法
Environmental Protection law 环境保护法
Taxation law 税务法
New plastic-bags standards 塑料袋使用规定
One Child Policy 独生子女政策
Anti-*oking Law 禁烟法
二、如何组织语言
选好了描述哪个法律之后,接下来就要回答"What the law is"这个问题.对于广大非法律专业的考生来说,不需要很深入的描述,只需要回答法律颁布或实施时间、主要内容以及颁布的主要目的就可以了.
? New plastic-bags standards 塑料袋使用规定
New plastic-bags standards went to effect from June, 2008. New
standards forbid supermarkets and shops from handing out colorized
plastic bags. Authorities say those bags are mainly made of wasted
plastics which will pollute the environment. The standards also have
other industrial requirements. For example, plastic bags should have a
thickness of no less than 0.025 millimeter, so that they can be reused.
Enterprises fail to conform to standards will face severe punishment.
Anti-*oking Law 禁烟法
Anti-*oking Law became effective in May, 2021. It bans tobacco
*oking in workplaces and other public spaces in door. The health
consequences of the tobacco epidemic are very serious in China and
*oking has become the top killer of the Chinese population. Our
government is working on making all public spaces—including work sites
and transportation options—tobacco-free for the well-being of Chinese
citizens.
New labour law 新劳动法
The new law greatly limits the use of short-term contracts. The new
law allows employers to assign only two consecutive fixed-term
contracts. After that the employer must offer the employee an open-ended
contract.
The law imposes severe restrictions on the use of probationary
periods in the employment relationship. Probationary periods are
permitted, but the length is limited. Furthermore, an employee can only
be subject to a single probationary period by a single employer. Wages
during the probationary period must also be no less than 80% of the
contract wage.
三、法律带来的好处
至于法律带来的好处,可以是对整个社会带来的效益,也可以是对个人以及某些社会团体带来的意义,甚至是对我们的地球、环境带来的好处.
New plastic-bags standards 塑料袋使用规定:
China's new standard is to change consumers' shopping habits. If
everyone can use just one plastic bag a day, he or she can save around
300 bags a year. And that would mean as much as a 2-thirds reduction in
the use of plastic bags for the entire country. Mainly aimed at
protecting the environment. Stop the "White pollution".
Road Traffic Safety Law 道路交通安全法:
It has been rightly said that when a man is sitting behind a
steering wheel, his car becomes the extension of his personality.
Drunken driving may cause traffic accident and death. Strictly abide by
traffic law will guarantee a safe driving. Only Stricter Traffic Laws
Can Prevent Accidents. The strict law about road traffic safety helps
creating a safe, harmonious, orderly and convenient traffic environment
through which the happiness of people can be improved.
? One Child Policy 独生子女政策:
The one child policy is an effective way of reducing the population
of China, which is one of the largest one all over the world. Limiting
the growth of population is favorable to economic growth. It can also
release the burden of protecting the environment. One-child policy has
helped the fight against global warming by avoiding 300 million births.
That means, without one child policy in China, we can hardly have the
chance to enjoy all the affluence and living comfort we enjoy now.
? New labor law 新劳动法:
Chinese workers are increasingly aware of their rights. These laws
seem more favorable to workers. The New labor law has been actively
publicized and employees are well informed about their rights under the
new law, trying to redress the balance of power between workers and
employers. For example, mines and construction sites have been getting a
lot of attention for several years now. Workers were clearly being
abused. All of this represented a source of social instability, and I
think they just decided they couldn't afford it. So they decided to get
at one root cause: the lack of contracts. Implementation and enforcement
are traditionally the weakest points of labor law in China.
2023年6月1日雅思写作考试真题及解析
您好,我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上,选择合适的学校和专业,准备相关考试,都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问,我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问!
本月初的雅思考试已经顺利结束,大家来跟小钟老师看一看2023年6月1日雅思写作考试真题及解析。
双边讨论类大作文社会话题-环保话题
Human activities have negative effectson plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believeeffectivemeasures can be taken to improve this uss both views and give your opinion.
题目大意:
人类活动对动植物产生负面影响。有人说采取任何措施都为时已晚;而其他人说可以采取措施改变这个情况。双边讨论并给出你的观点。
思路:
双边讨论题目,建议在讨论双边观点时,都分析各自的合理性,而不要去写各自的坏处,最后再给出自己的观点,即单边支持一方或中立。
在双方立场针对同一话题对立时,在论证时尽量对双方观点有明确的限定,如甲方的观点是具体在怎样的前提下才是合理的,而再其他前提下,则是乙方的观点有道理。避免因为描述模糊而导致矛盾或观点的不清晰。
审题,找出关键词:
toolate to do anything:甲方认为采取任何措施都为时已晚(即在分析甲方这一观点的合理性时,可以举出具体的客观事实或公认的真理,来证明为何没有办法)
effectivemeasurescan be taken to improve this situation:乙方认为还可以采取有效措施,弥补问题(论证乙方合理性时,也要提出具体可行的建议,强调其对拯救动植物的有效性)
范文
It is true that human activities have exerted detrimental effects on plants and animals, with conflicting views on how to curb this trend. While some people regard it too late to tackle this problem, I would agree with the argument that there are still some measures we can do to conserve the environment.
On the one hand, it is easy to understand why some people are pessimistic about the feasibility of reasons leading to the desperation is that survival of the fittest has long been rule in the nature for centuries, meaning that it is futile to reverse the trend. The past decades have witnessed various attempts being put forward by many NGOs (non-governmental organizations) with expectation to save endangered species, the sad truth is that they do little help to change the reality on the ground. One compelling example is the death of the last white rhino in this century regardless of the enormous effort and money invested in the conservation project.
However, I support the opponents who believe that it is not time to be desperate, while there are practical measures waiting to be implemented to reverse the trend. At administrative level, the government could initiate laws to restrict the relentless exploitation of natural environment. By doing so, the habitats of avariety of flora and fauna can be preserved, which allows enough living spacefor wildlife to survive and breed. For individuals, people could stop buying products made from precious animals or plants, whether these be crocodile bagsor artefacts made of ivory. Were it not for the demand for such products, the hunting and poaching would be mitigate d to a large extent.
In my opinion, although it is too late to revive the wildlife that have already been extinct, there are still a lot we can do to save other animals and plants at risk.
相关词汇:
Detrimental 有害的
Curb 遏制
Pessimistic 悲观的
Futile 徒劳的
Relentless 毫无节制的
Exploitation 开发
Floraand fauna 动植物
Habitat 栖息地
Poaching 捕猎
Mitigate 减轻
希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助,我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站
,在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利!
2021年6月13日雅思写作考试真题及答案
上周的雅思考试已经顺利结束,真题和答案也已经公布,接下来就和看一看2021年6月13日雅思写作考试真题及答案。
大作文
Some people say individuals can do nothing to improve the environment,only governments and large companies can make a what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目大意:
个人无力改善环境。只有*和大公司可以做到。同意或反对?
思路:
任务回应:
题目观点由2部分组成,需全部回应:1)个人无力改善环境;2)环保只能靠*和企业;
论证逻辑:
文章中遇到带有武断含义的词要留意,Only是强调排他性的武断表达,如果选择同意,很难证明(即很难从逻辑推导出*和企业和环保之间的唯一性,也很难用2个以上的成功案例来证明这是一个普遍的事实),所以这道题目建议选择完全反对。即主体段-1:写个人完全可以有所作为来改善环境;主体段-2:反驳“只有*企业能改善环境”这个武断的概念(即光靠他们这种理论说不通)
范文
Some people assert that there is no justification for individuals in tackling environmental problems,whereas it is the business exclusive to authorities and companies. I completely disagree with this opinion as I do not see any fields that can be isolated from the general public.
From an individual perspective, there are many things they can do to reduce their contribute to environmental pollution. One option is that residents can reduce the emissions of the carbon dioxide by driving less and traveling more by public effect has been approved in many metropolitan cities like Shanghai, where convenient and affordable public transport services have played an importantrole in the reduction of exhaust fumes from vehicles. Another practical action that can be taken by individuals is to classify rubbish, which can make a huge difference in recycling waste.
In addition, it looks absurd to me that environmental issues are reckoned to be only addressed by politicians and business moguls. While some might argue that it is the administration that has the power to legislate against pollution, we should not forget that many bills are initiated under the influence of the public opinion. One convincing example is the decision of Brexit based on the referendum of British citizens. Also,industrial pollution should not be the only culprit to blame. One striking fact we cannot afford to ignore is the enormous amount of daily rubbish from households, such as the plastic bags and packages. How can we focus only on enterprises while turning a blind eye on household waste?
In conclusion, I do not think the problem of pollution could be addressed by authorities and large companies without the involvement of individuals.
小作文
题型:柱状图
题目:5个国家的人均杂志购*量
以上就是雅思无忧小编为大家带来的内容了,想要了解更多相关信息,请关注雅思无忧。
雅思培训
免责声明:文章内容来自网络,如有侵权请及时联系删除。