2021雅思阅读练习题 3月10日雅思阅读机经

很多关注雅思阅读的朋友很希望了解2021雅思阅读练习题 3月10日雅思阅读机经，今天雅思无忧为大家整理了相关文章，一起来看看吧！

2021年雅思阅读模拟试卷：英国需要强大的电视产业

对于雅思考试，在考试之前，如果做一套雅思模拟题，对于雅思考试来说是很有帮助的，一方面可以了解雅思考试的考试模式，另一方面在正式考试的时候也不会那么紧张，那么下面就和的我来看看2021年雅思阅读模拟试卷：英国需要强大的电视产业。

IELTS Academic Reading Test 1. Section 3

This is the final section of IELTS Reading practice test #1. After you complete it， press ＇check＇ and ＇get result＇ and you will see your result for this Reading test.

READING PASSAGE 3

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27–40， which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.

Britain needs strong TV industry

Comedy writer Armando Iannucci has called for an industry-wide defence of the BBC and British programme-makers. ＂The Thick of It＂ creator made his remarks in the annual MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh TV Festival.

＂It＇s more important than ever that we have more strong， popular channels... that act as beacons， drawing audiences to the best content，＂ he said. Speaking earlier， Culture Secretary John Whittingdale rejected suggestions that he wanted to di*antle the BBC.

＇Champion supporters＇

Iannucci co-wrote ＂I＇m Alan Partridge＂， wrote the movie ＂In the Loop＂ and created and wrote the hit ＂HBO＂ and ＂Sky Atlantic show Veep＂. He delivered the 40th annual MacTaggart Lecture， which has previously been given by Oscar winner Kevin Spacey， former BBC director general Greg Dyke， Jeremy Paxman and Rupert Murdoch. Iannucci said： ＂Faced with a global audience， British television needs its champion supporters.＂

He continued his praise for British programming by saying the global success of American TV shows had come about because they were emulating British television. ＂The best US shows are modelling themselves on what used to make British TV so world-beating，＂ he said. ＂US prime-time schedules are now littered with those quirky formats from the UK - the ＂Who Do You Think You Are＂＇s and the variants on ＂Strictly Come Dancing＂ - as well as the single-camera non-audience sitcom， which we brought into the mainstream first. We have changed international viewing for the better.＂

With the renewal of the BBC＇s royal charter approaching， Iannucci also praised the corporation. He said： ＂If public service broadcasting - one of the best things we＇ve ever done creatively as a country - if it was a car industry， our ministers would be out championing it overseas， trying to win contracts， boasting of the British jobs that would bring.＂ In July， the government issued a green paper setting out issues that will be explored during negotiations over the future of the BBC， including the broadcaster＇s size， its funding and governance.

Primarily Mr Whittingdale wanted to appoint a panel of five people， but finally he invited two more people to advise on the channer renewal， namely former Channel 4 boss Dawn Airey and journali* professor Stewart Purvis， a former editor-in-chief of ITN. Iannucci bemoaned the lack of ＂creatives＂ involved in the discussions.

＂When the media， communications and information industries make up nearly 8% our GDP， larger than the car and oil and gas industries put together， we need to be heard， as those industries are heard. But when I see the panel of experts who＇ve been asked by the culture secretary to take a root and branch look at the BBC， I don＇t see anyone who is a part of that cast and crew list. I see executives， media owners， industry gurus， all talented people - but not a single person who＇s made a classic and enduring television show.＂

＇Don＇t be modest＇

Iannucci suggested one way of easing the strain on the licence fee was ＂by pushing ourselves more commercially abroad＂.

＂Use the BBC＇s name， one of the most recognised brands in the world，＂ he said. ＂And use the reputation of British television across all networks， to capitalise financially oversees. Be more aggressive in selling our shows， through advertising， through proper international subscription channels， freeing up BBC Worldwide to be fully commercial， whatever it takes.

＂Frankly， don＇t be icky and modest about making money， let＇s monetise the bezeesus Mary and Joseph out of our programmes abroad so that money can come back， take some pressure off the licence fee at home and be invested in even more ambitious quality shows， that can only add to our value.＂

Mr Whittingdale， who was interviewed by ITV News＇ Alastair Stewart at the festival， said he wanted an open debate about whether the corporation should do everything it has done in the past. He said he had a slight sense that people who rushed to defend the BBC were ＂trying to have an argument that＇s never been started＂.

＂Whatever my view is， I don＇t determine what programmes the BBC should show，＂ he added. ＂That＇s the job of the BBC.＂ Mr Whittingdale said any speculation that the Conservative Party had always wanted to change the BBC due to issues such as its editorial line was ＂absolute nonsense＂.

Questions 27-31

Do the following statements agree with the information in the IELTS reading text？

In boxes 27–31 on your answer sheet， write

TRUE if the statement agrees with the information

FALSE if the statement contradicts the information

NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

27. Armando Iannucci expressed a need of having more popular channels.

28. John Whittingdale wanted to di*antle the BBC.

29. Iannucci delivered the 30th annual MacTaggart Lecture.

30. Ianucci believes that British television has contributed to the success of American TV-shows.

31. There have been negotiations over the future of the BBC in July.

Questions 32–35

Choose the correct letter， A， B， C or D.

Write the correct letter in boxes 32-35 on your answer sheet.

32. Ianucci praised everything EXCEPT

A US shows

B British shows

C Corporation

D British programming

33. To advise on the charter renewal Mr Whittingdale appointed a panel of

A five people

B two people

C seven people

D four people

34. Who of these people was NOT invited to the discussion concerning BBC renewal？

A Armando Iannucci

B Dawn Airey

C John Whittingdale

D Stewart Purvis

35. There panel of experts lacks：

A media owners

B people who make enduring TV-shows

C gurus of Television industry

D top executives

Questions 36–40

Complete the summary below.

Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 37–40 on your answer sheet.

Easing the strain on the licence fees

Iannucci recommended increasing BBC＇s profit by pushing ourselves more 36.________. He suggests being more aggressive in selling British shows， through advertising and proper international 37.________. Also， he invokes producers to stop being 38. ________ and modest about making money and invest into even 39.________ quality shows. However， Mr Whittingdale denied any 40.________ that the Conservative Party had always wanted to change the BBC because of its editorial line.

2021年3月10日雅思阅读机经

雅思阅读类型很多，那么雅思阅读机经题目有哪些呢?想必是不少人士比较关心的问题，和一起来了解了解2021年3月10日雅思阅读机经，欢迎阅读。

2021年3月10日雅思阅读机经

Passage 1

题材：科技类

题目：Man or Machine

大意：介绍了机器人的发展及应用。

题型分类：段落信息配对题6，填空7

Passage 2

题材：环境类

题目：London Smog

大意：主要讨论伦敦大雾的研究与影响。

题型分类：人名配对5，填空4，判断题4

Passage 3

题材：语言学类

题目： Language or Philosophy

大意：主要介绍了了对于语言的研究。

题型分类：单选6，完成句子配对题4，判断题3

相关阅读文章推荐

【相关文章推荐】

London Smog

For hundreds of years, the mists and fogs of Britain's major cities were all too often polluted and noxious, with London especially badly affected. The fogs endangered health and also posed a threat to travelers who lost their way and thus became an easy prey to robbers. Around 1807, the *oke-laden fog of the capital came to be known as a 'London particular', i.e. a London characteristic. Charles Dickens used the term in Bleak House (published in 1853) and provided graphic descriptions of London's fogs in this and other novels.

The *oke-laden fog that shrouded the capital from Friday 5 December to Tuesday 9 December 1952 brought premature death to thousands and inconvenience to millions. An estimated 4,000 people died because of it, and cattle at Smithfield, were, the press reported, asphyxiated. Road, rail and air transport were almost brought to a standstill and a performance at the Sadler's Wells Theatre had to be suspended when fog in the auditorium made conditions intolerable for the audience and performers.

The death toll of about 4,000 was not disputed by the medical and other authorities, but exactly how many people perished as a direct result of the fog will never be known. Many who died already suffered from chronic respiratory or cardiovascular complaints. Without the fog, they might not have died when they did.

The total number of deaths in Greater London in the week ending 6 December 1952 was 2,062, which was close to normal for the time of year. The following week, the number was 4,703. The death rate peaked at 900 per day on the 8th and 9th and remained above average until just before Christmas. Mortality from bronchitis and pneumonia increased more than sevenfold as a result of the fog. The fog of December 1952 was by no means the first to bring death and inconvenience to the capital. On 27 December 1813 fog was so dense that the Prince Regent, having set out for Hatfield House, was forced to turn back at Kentish Town. The fog persisted for almost a week and on one day was so thick that the mail coach from London to Birmingham took seven hours to reach Uxbridge. Contemporary accounts tell of the fog being so thick that the other side of the street could not be seen. They also tell of the fog bearing a distinct *ell of coal tar. After a similar fog during the week of 7-13 December 1873, the death rate in the Administrative County of London increased to 40 per cent above normal. Marked increases in death rate occurred, too, after the notable fogs of January 1880, February 1882, December 1891, December 1892 and November 1948. The worst affected area of London was usually the East End, where the density of factories and domestic dwellings was greater than almost anywhere else in the capital. The area was also low-lying, which inhibited fog dispersal.

In early December 1952, the weather was cold, as it had been for some weeks. The weather of November 1952 had been considerably colder than average, with heavy falls of snow in southern England towards the end of the month. To keep warm, the people of London were burning large quantities of coal in their grates. Smoke was pouring from the chimneys of their houses and becoming trapped beneath the inversion of an anticyclone that had developed over southern parts of the British Isles during the first week of December. Trapped, too, beneath this inversion were particles and gases emitted from factory chimneys in the London area, along with pollution which the winds from the east had brought from industrial areas on the continent.

Early on 5 December in the London area, the sky was clear, winds were light and the air near the ground was moist. Accordingly, conditions were ideal for the formation of radiation fog. The sky was clear, so a net loss of long-wave radiation occurred and the ground cooled. The moist air in contact with the ground cooled to its dew-point temperature and condensation occurred. Cool air drained katabolically into the Thames Valley. Beneath the inversion of the anticyclone, the very light wind stirred the saturated air upwards to form a layer of fog 100-200meters deep. Along with the water droplets of the fog, the atmosphere beneath the inversion contained the *oke from innumerable chimneys in the London area and farther afield. Elevated spots such as Hampstead Heath were above the fog and grime. From there, the hills of Surrey and Kent could be seen. During the day on 5 December, the fog was not especially dense and generally possessed a dry, *oky character. When nightfall came, however, the fog thickened. Visibility dropped to a fewmeters. The following day, the sun was too low in the sky to make much of an impression on the fog. That night and on the Sunday and Monday nights, the fog again thickened. In many parts of London, it was impossible at night for pedestrians to find their way, even in familiar districts. In the Isle of Dogs, the visibility was at times nil. The fog there was so thick that people could not see their own feet! Even in the drier thoroughfares of central London, the fog was exceptionally thick. Not until 9 December did it clear. In central London, the visibility remained below 500meters continuously for 114 hours and below 50meters continuously for 48 hours. At Heathrow Airport, visibility remained below ten meters for almost 48 hours from the morning of 6 December.

Huge quantities of impurities were released into the atmosphere during the period in question. On each day during the foggy period, the following amounts of pollutants were emitted: 1,000 tonnes of *oke particles, 2,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, 140 tonnes of hydrochloric acid and 14 tonnes of fluorine compounds. In addition, and perhaps most dangerously, 370 tonnes of sulphur dioxide were converted into 800 tonnes of sulphuric acid. At London's County Hall, the concentration of *oke in the air increased from 0.49 milligrams per cubic meter on 4 December to 4.46 on the 7th and 8th.

Legislation followed the Great Smog of 1952 in the form of the City of London (Various Powers) Act of 1954 and the Clean Air Acts of 1956 and 1968. These Acts banned emissions of black *oke and decreed that residents of urban areas and operators of factories must convert to *okeless fuels. As these residents and operators were necessarily given time to convert, however, fogs continued to be *oky for some time after the Act of 1956 was passed. In 1962, for example, 750 Londoners died as a result of a fog, but nothing on the scale of the 1952 Great Smog has ever occurred again.

以上是我从互联网整理的2021年3月10日雅思机经，谢谢您的阅读，更多资讯，请继续关注其他栏目。

2021年4月雅思阅读模拟题目：Next Year Marks

4月份雅思考试需要做好万分准备，那么雅思阅读模拟题目有哪些呢?想必是不少出国人士比较关心的问题，和一起来看看2021年4月雅思阅读模拟题目：Next Year Marks，欢迎阅读。

2021年4月雅思阅读模拟题目：Next Year Marks

Part I

Reading Passage 1

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-14 which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.

Next Year Marks the EU's 50th Anniversary of the Treaty

A.

After a period of introversion and stunned self-di*elief, continental European governments will recover their enthusia* for pan-European institution-building in 2007. Whether the European public will welcome a return to what voters in two countries had rejected so short a time before is another matter.

B.

There are several reasons for Europe’s recovering self-confidence. For years European economies had been lagging di*ally behind America (to say nothing of Asia), but in 2006 the large continental economies had one of their best years for a decade, briefly outstripping America in terms of growth. Since politics often reacts to economic change with a lag, 2006’s improvement in economic growth will have its impact in 2007, though the recovery may be ebbing by then.

C.

The coming year also marks a particular point in a political cycle so regular that it almost seems to amount to a natural law. Every four or five years, European countries take a large stride towards further integration by signing a new treaty: the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, the Treaty of Nice in 2001. And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters. But the political impetus to sign something every four or five years has only been interrupted, not immobilised, by this setback.

D.

In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter. Government leaders have already agreed to celebrate it ceremoniously, restating their commitment to “ever closer union” and the basic ideals of European unity. By itself, and in normal circumstances, the EU’s 50th-birthday greeting to itself would be fairly meaningless, a routine expression of European good fellowship. But it does not take a Machiavelli to spot that once governments have signed the declaration (and it seems unlikely anyone would be so uncollegiate as to veto it) they will already be halfway towards committing themselves to a new treaty. All that will be necessary will be to incorporate the 50th-anniversary declaration into a new treaty containing a number of institutional and other reforms extracted from the failed attempt at constitution-building and—hey presto—a new quasi-constitution will be ready.

E.

According to the German government—which holds the EU’s agenda-setting presidency during the first half of 2007—there will be a new draft of a slimmed-down constitution ready by the middle of the year, perhaps to put to voters, perhaps not. There would then be a couple of years in which it will be discussed, approved by parliaments and, perhaps, put to voters if that is deemed unavoidable. Then, according to bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin, blithely ignoring the possibility of public rejection, the whole thing will be signed, sealed and a new constitution delivered in 2009-10. Europe will be nicely back on schedule. Its four-to-five-year cycle of integration will have missed only one beat.

F.

The resurrection of the European constitution will be made more likely in 2007 because of what is happening in national capitals. The European Union is not really an autonomous organisation. If it functions, it is because the leaders of the big continental countries want it to, reckoning that an active European policy will help them get done what they want to do in their own countries.

G.

That did not happen in 2005-06. Defensive, cynical and self-destructive, the leaders of the three largest euro-zone countries—France, Italy and Germany—were stumbling towards their unlamented ends. They saw no reason to pursue any sort of European policy and the EU, as a result, barely functioned. But by the middle of 2007 all three will have gone, and this fact alone will transform the European political landscape.

H.

The upshot is that the politics of the three large continental countries, bureaucratic momentum and the economics of recovery will all be aligned to give a push towards integration in 2007. That does not mean the momentum will be irresistible or even popular. The British government, for one, will almost certainly not want to go with the flow, beginning yet another chapter in the long history of confrontation between Britain and the rest of Europe. More important, the voters will want a say. They rejected the constitution in 2005. It would be foolish to assume they will accept it after 2007 just as a result of an artful bit of tinkering.

以上就是雅思无忧为大家带来的2021雅思阅读练习题 3月10日雅思阅读机经，希望能帮助到大家，更多相关信息，敬请关注雅思无忧！

雅思培训
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。